Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
44
Shoots
Left
Height
198 cm
Weight
98 kg
Born
Milwaukee, USA
Draft
2001, round 1, #30 (LAK)

Career · 2009–10 to 2013–14

Games
270
Goals
20
Points
48
TOI per game
11:57
xGF% (5v5)
50.4%
Goals above expected
−8.5

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10WSH7951116+412:24905.6%18.4–
2010–11WSH575611−311:34618.2%07.350.3%
2010–11NJD18101−312:50185.6%01.350.6%
2010–11All teams756612−611:53797.6%08.650.4%
2011–12TOR768513−1412:507910.1%19.048.6%
2012–13TOR13011−27:0440.0%00.656.2%
2012–13ANA21156+210:37195.3%01.549.4%
2012–13All teams3416709:16234.3%02.151.3%
2013–14ANA6000010:5080.0%00.468.5%
Total4 teams270202848−1611:572797.2%228.550.4%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.550100150200250
6m8m10m12m14m16m18m50100150200250Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2013–14 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

4th line

25th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

Extra / AHL
  • Goals /600.3715th pct
  • Assists /600.5213th pct
  • ixG /600.5321st pct
  • Goals above expected−8.511th pct

Play-driving

2nd line
  • xGF% (5v5)50.4%59th pct
  • CF% (5v5)48.5%41st pct
  • Relative xGF%+1.568th pct
  • Penalty diff /600.1961st pct

Usage

4th line
  • TOI per game11:5730th pct
  • PP time share2.7%20th pct
  • Offensive zone starts29.5%3rd pct
  • Quality of competition23.7%34th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Steckel wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2013–14, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 929+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

59.3%

2011–1379 · #4 of 176 regulars, 98th percentile

Against an average centre

59.3%

Opponents won 50.0% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.0% against them.

Wins above average

+317

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

12.6

3,390 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

57%489 · −0.464%373 · +1.548%280 · +0.663%123 · +1.952%106 · +1.063%155 · +0.262%113 · +0.661%937 · +2.160%814 · +1.9Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone57.0% 378–285
  • Neutral zone58.6% 578–408
  • Defensive zone60.6% 1055–686

By strength

  • Even strength59.5% 1409–960
  • Power play57.1% 48–36
  • Shorthanded58.5% 522–370

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +3 after a win, −20 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.3 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–10107359.5%59.7%
2010–1182062.3%62.0%
2011–12110858.0%57.8%
2012–1332154.5%55.0%
2013–146864.7%65.9%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−8.5 goals above expected

010203050100150200250Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60+80+100