- Age
- 50
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 185 cm
- Weight
- 90 kg
- Born
- Thunder Bay, CAN
- Draft
- 1994, round 2, #36 (FLA)
Career · 2009–10 to 2010–11
- Games
- 92
- Goals
- 2
- Points
- 11
- TOI per game
- 10:31
- xGF% (5v5)
- 50.9%
- Goals above expected
- −2.2
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2010–11 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
11th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.121st pct
- Assists /600.5613th pct
- ixG /600.260th pct
- Goals above expected−2.233rd pct
Play-driving
4th line- xGF% (5v5)50.9%57th pct
- CF% (5v5)49.1%41st pct
- Relative xGF%−1.936th pct
- Penalty diff /60-0.0632nd pct
Usage
Extra / AHL- TOI per game10:3112th pct
- PP time share0.7%4th pct
- Offensive zone starts25.2%2nd pct
- Quality of competition23.0%9th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Johnson wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2010–11, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 405+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
56.6%
474–364 · #13 of 179 regulars, 93rd percentile
Against an average centre
56.5%
Opponents won 50.0% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.0% against them.
Wins above average
+55
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
9.3
838 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone61.2% 101–64
- Neutral zone55.2% 117–95
- Defensive zone55.5% 256–205
By strength
- Even strength58.7% 347–244
- Power play66.7% 10–5
- Shorthanded50.4% 114–112
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +3 after a win, −26 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.6 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Darren Helm72.4% 21–8
- Kyle Chipchura44.4% 8–10
- Jonathan Toews25.0% 4–12
- Matt Duchene57.1% 8–6
- Paul Stastny42.9% 6–8
- Mike Modano64.3% 9–5
- Tom Wandell58.3% 7–5
- Valtteri Filppula58.3% 7–5
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 526 | 52.7% | 52.5% |
| 2010–11 | 312 | 63.1% | 63.3% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−2.2 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games