- Age
- 39
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 185 cm
- Weight
- 91 kg
- Born
- Sodertalje, SWE
- Draft
- 2005, round 5, #146 (DAL)
Career · 2009–10 to 2012–13
- Games
- 215
- Goals
- 19
- Points
- 40
- TOI per game
- 11:18
- xGF% (5v5)
- 52.7%
- Goals above expected
- −3.7
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2012–13 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
3rd line
43rd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.4724th pct
- Assists /600.5213th pct
- ixG /600.5623rd pct
- Goals above expected−3.726th pct
Play-driving
1st line- xGF% (5v5)52.7%79th pct
- CF% (5v5)51.8%72nd pct
- Relative xGF%+5.390th pct
- Penalty diff /600.7495th pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game11:1824th pct
- PP time share5.5%30th pct
- Offensive zone starts49.0%29th pct
- Quality of competition22.9%13th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Wandell wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2012–13, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 727+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
43.7%
593–763 · #170 of 179 regulars, 5th percentile
Against an average centre
44.1%
Opponents won 50.4% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.6% against them.
Wins above average
−80
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
6.4
1,356 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone45.6% 162–193
- Neutral zone43.1% 285–377
- Defensive zone43.1% 146–193
By strength
- Even strength43.8% 520–666
- Power play54.1% 33–28
- Shorthanded36.9% 38–65
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +16 after a win, −10 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.5 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Antoine Vermette35.7% 10–18
- Pavel Datsyuk37.0% 10–17
- Jarret Stoll38.5% 10–16
- Saku Koivu65.2% 15–8
- David Legwand50.0% 11–11
- Ryan Kesler50.0% 11–11
- Cory Emmerton33.3% 7–14
- Joe Pavelski26.3% 5–14
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 486 | 44.4% | 45.0% |
| 2010–11 | 435 | 43.7% | 43.5% |
| 2011–12 | 324 | 43.5% | 44.4% |
| 2012–13 | 111 | 41.4% | 42.3% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−3.7 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games