Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #17

Toby Petersen

Age
47
Shoots
Left
Height
178 cm
Weight
88 kg
Born
Minneapolis, USA
Draft
1998, round 9, #244 (PIT)

Career · 2009–10 to 2012–13

Games
178
Goals
13
Points
26
TOI per game
9:53
xGF% (5v5)
51.9%
Goals above expected
−3.4

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10DAL789615+310:551108.2%08.3–
2010–11DAL60246−710:02583.4%04.448.1%
2011–12DAL39235−77:39444.5%13.559.3%
2012–13DAL100006:400–00.155.8%
Total1 team178131326−119:532126.1%116.451.9%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.420406080100120140160
6m8m10m12m14m16m20406080100120140160Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2012–13 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

4th line

31st percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

Extra / AHL
  • Goals /600.4423rd pct
  • Assists /600.449th pct
  • ixG /600.5622nd pct
  • Goals above expected−3.428th pct

Play-driving

1st line
  • xGF% (5v5)51.9%73rd pct
  • CF% (5v5)48.2%38th pct
  • Relative xGF%+3.179th pct
  • Penalty diff /600.5588th pct

Usage

Extra / AHL
  • TOI per game9:5313th pct
  • PP time share5.0%29th pct
  • Offensive zone starts41.1%15th pct
  • Quality of competition22.4%4th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Petersen wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2012–13, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 727+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

41.8%

125–174 · below the 727 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

42.3%

Opponents won 50.5% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.5% against them.

Wins above average

−23

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

3.1

299 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

51%59 · −0.146%46 · +1.434%41 · +3.947%15 · 0.044%9 · +12.032%19 · +0.342%19 · +0.347%47 · +1.830%44 · −2.7Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone40.9% 36–52
  • Neutral zone45.5% 55–66
  • Defensive zone37.8% 34–56

By strength

  • Even strength43.9% 100–128
  • Power play44.4% 4–5
  • Shorthanded33.9% 21–41

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +8 after a win, −13 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.1 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–1017044.1%44.5%
2010–1112038.3%38.8%
2011–12742.9%45.6%
2012–13250.0%52.4%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−3.4 goals above expected

05101520406080100120140160Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60+80