Centre · #21
Ryan White
- Age
- 38
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 183 cm
- Weight
- 91 kg
- Born
- Brandon, CAN
- Draft
- 2006, round 3, #66 (MTL)
Career · 2009–10 to 2016–17
- Games
- 313
- Goals
- 31
- Points
- 61
- TOI per game
- 11:05
- xGF% (5v5)
- 43.2%
- Goals above expected
- +4.6
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2009–10 |   MTL | 16 | 0 | 2 | 2 | −6 | 11:09 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.7 | – |
| 2010–11 | MTL | 27 | 2 | 3 | 5 | +5 | 8:55 | 30 | 6.7% | 0 | 1.9 | 49.7% |
| 2011–12 | MTL | 20 | 0 | 3 | 3 | −7 | 14:31 | 12 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.7 | 39.9% |
| 2012–13 | MTL | 26 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 9:25 | 16 | 6.3% | 0 | 1.6 | 43.3% |
| 2013–14 | MTL | 52 | 2 | 4 | 6 | −8 | 9:41 | 51 | 3.9% | 0 | 3.6 | 38.0% |
| 2014–15 |   PHI | 34 | 6 | 6 | 12 | +4 | 11:43 | 45 | 13.3% | 0 | 3.9 | 50.5% |
| 2015–16 | PHI | 73 | 11 | 5 | 16 | −9 | 12:34 | 88 | 12.5% | 3 | 9.5 | 44.3% |
| 2016–17 |   ARI | 46 | 7 | 6 | 13 | −8 | 10:57 | 43 | 16.3% | 0 | 2.7 | 38.6% |
| 2016–17 |   MIN | 19 | 2 | 1 | 3 | −8 | 9:57 | 17 | 11.8% | 0 | 1.7 | 45.5% |
| 2016–17 | All teams | 65 | 9 | 7 | 16 | −16 | 10:39 | 60 | 15.0% | 0 | 4.5 | 40.5% |
| Total | 4 teams | 313 | 31 | 30 | 61 | −36 | 11:05 | 307 | 10.1% | 3 | 26.4 | 43.2% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2016–17 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
13th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
4th line- Goals /600.5436th pct
- Assists /600.5217th pct
- ixG /600.4611th pct
- Goals above expected+4.680th pct
Play-driving
Extra / AHL- xGF% (5v5)43.2%11th pct
- CF% (5v5)45.2%15th pct
- Relative xGF%−5.913th pct
- Penalty diff /60-0.439th pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game11:0524th pct
- PP time share6.6%34th pct
- Offensive zone starts43.4%20th pct
- Quality of competition22.8%10th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often White wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2016–17, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1539+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
51.2%
625–596 · below the 1539 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
51.0%
Opponents won 49.8% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.2% against them.
Wins above average
+12
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
4.9
1,221 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone48.5% 163–173
- Neutral zone54.5% 206–172
- Defensive zone50.5% 256–251
By strength
- Even strength50.8% 526–510
- Power play66.7% 20–10
- Shorthanded50.7% 77–75
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +4 after a win, −17 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.8 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Dominic Moore77.8% 14–4
- Jordan Staal47.1% 8–9
- Casey Cizikas43.8% 7–9
- Kyle Turris25.0% 4–12
- Derek Stepan43.8% 7–9
- John Tavares64.3% 9–5
- Adam Henrique21.4% 3–11
- Scott Gomez50.0% 7–7
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 10 | 70.0% | 72.0% |
| 2010–11 | 32 | 40.6% | 40.7% |
| 2011–12 | 59 | 49.2% | 48.3% |
| 2012–13 | 167 | 54.5% | 54.4% |
| 2013–14 | 388 | 50.8% | 50.7% |
| 2014–15 | 123 | 52.8% | 52.8% |
| 2015–16 | 351 | 52.4% | 51.9% |
| 2016–17 | 91 | 42.9% | 42.5% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
+4.6 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games