Skip to content
Ice Lab

Western Conference · Central Division

Arizona Coyotes

2023–24·36–41–5·77 points·7th in the Central, 13th in the Western

Points
77#27
Goal differential
−20#24
xGF% (5v5, adj.)
48.1%#24
Power play
22.0%#15
Penalty kill
76.3%#25
GSAx
−3.7#18

The season

How the points piled up, compared with the rest of the conference.

Coyotes points race

Cumulative standings points by game number. The dashed line is the pace of the final playoff cut. Tap teams below to pin up to four.

02040608010012001020304050607080PointsGame number
Final playoff-cut pace

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trends show. The calendar below has every result; click a day to open the game.

Ten-game rolling averages

Goals and expected goals per game for and against the Coyotes, averaged over the previous ten games. When the solid lines drift above the dashed ones, results are running ahead of the chances.

Goals forExpected goals forGoals againstExpected goals against
2.02.53.03.54.04.51020304050607080Per gameGame number
Results calendar

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

W WinO Overtime or shootout lossL Regulation lossFilled cells are home games, outlined cells road games.

Team fingerprint

Where the team ranks among all 32 on the numbers that matter most. Bars show the percentile; the tick marks the league middle.

Results

  • Points %.470#27 of 32
  • Goal differential−20#24 of 32
  • Points above expected−3.0#20 of 32

Offence

  • Goals for per game3.10#17 of 32
  • xGF /60 (5v5)2.44#21 of 32
  • Shot attempts /60 (5v5)56.58#24 of 32
  • Power play %22.0%#15 of 32

Defence

  • Goals against per game3.34#25 of 32
  • xGA /60 (5v5)2.64#24 of 32
  • Penalty kill %76.3%#25 of 32
  • Goals saved above expected−3.7#18 of 32

Control

  • xGF% (5v5, adjusted)48.1%#24 of 32
  • CF% (5v5)48.5%#22 of 32
  • Faceoff %45.1%#31 of 32

Luck or skill?

Teams that score more than their chances deserve, or concede fewer, often regress. Here is how far this team strayed from its expected goals.

Goals against expectations

Cumulative goals (solid) against expected goals (dashed) through the season, in all situations. The gap is finishing on the left and goaltending on the right; the dot plots place every team.

Scoring +11.6 goals vs expected

0501001502002501020304050607080

Finishing, all 32 teams (goals − xG)

−40−30−20−100+10+20+30+40

Preventing −5.3 goals saved vs expected

-500501001502002503001020304050607080

Goaltending, all 32 teams (xG against − goals against)

−40−30−20−100+10+20+30+40

Strong starts, strong finishes

Some teams control the first period and fade; others come on late.

Period by period

Share of expected goals in each period: 5-on-5 in regulation, all situations in 3-on-3 overtime. The grey band is the middle half of the league, the light band the full range, and the tick the league median.

P1
47.6%
P2
48.3%
P3
48.2%
OT
56.2%
40%50%60%