Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 12, 2024·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Arizona Coyotes 3, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 78% of the time.

PHI winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI1721006323
PHI07214313534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:26ARIMathew DumbaAssists: Clayton Keller, Travis Dermott · Slap, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:23PHIMorgan FrostUnassisted · Wrist, 0.35 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:57ARIMatias MaccelliAssists: J.J. Moser, Michael Kesselring · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:55PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Scott Laughton · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:02ARIAlexander KerfootAssists: Jason Zucker, J.J. Moser · Backhand, 0.18 xG3–2
  6. P3 6:12PHIJamie DrysdaleAssists: Travis Konecny · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–3
  7. P3 10:21PHIScott LaughtonGWGAssists: Travis Sanheim, Marc Staal · Wrap-around, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:39PHIOwen TippettENAssists: Travis Konecny, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.63 xG3–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:54PHIOlle Lycksell: Interference2 min
  2. P1 4:55PHIGarnet Hathaway: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 7:47ARITravis Dermott: Holding2 min
  4. P2 4:23ARIMichael Kesselring: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  5. P2 5:54ARISean Durzi: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 5:56PHITravis Sanheim: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 8:41PHICam York: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 9:02ARIJason Zucker: Interference2 min
  9. P2 15:55ARIJack McBain: Tripping2 min
  10. P2 19:17ARINick Bjugstad: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 2:16ARISean Durzi: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  12. P3 10:21ARIMathew Dumba: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against McBain
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIPHI
23Shots on goal34
2.0Expected goals3.7
50Shot attempts68
29Faceoffs won41
4Power plays7
14Penalty minutes8
20Hits20
15Blocked shots13
4Giveaways3
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestZucker – Kerfoot – Ruzicka6:55

    xG 0.30–0.18 (63%)attempts 6–8goals 1–0

  2. Bjugstad – Crouse – Maccelli7:27

    xG 0.18–0.15 (54%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  3. Schmaltz – Keller – McBain9:25

    xG 0.15–0.26 (36%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  4. Hayton – Guenther – Cooley6:21

    xG 0.30–0.50 (37%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDurzi – Moser7:48

    xG 0.29–0.09 (77%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  2. Kesselring – Moser4:29

    xG 0.25–0.14 (64%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  3. Välimäki – Durzi4:14

    xG 0.15–0.06 (70%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHathaway – Poehling – Cates3:32

    xG 0.29–0.09 (77%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  2. Laughton – Hathaway – Cates2:12

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 1–0

  3. Couturier – Konecny – Tippett3:55

    xG 0.13–0.13 (49%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Konecny – Tippett – Poehling4:53

    xG 0.08–0.25 (24%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStaal – Sanheim4:42

    xG 0.36–0.09 (80%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  2. Sanheim – York5:24

    xG 0.18–0.05 (77%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Staal – Drysdale4:02

    xG 0.18–0.12 (59%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.7 xGARI 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #142 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.36 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 24% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 78% of the time.

PHI winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).