Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 12, 2023·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Arizona Coyotes 2, Pittsburgh Penguins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 86% of the time.

PIT winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI2701004221
PIT214017212443

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:12PITJake GuentzelPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Valtteri Puustinen · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:20ARILawson CrousePPAssists: Jason Zucker, Juuso Välimäki · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:24ARIMatias MaccelliPPAssists: Lawson Crouse, Nick Bjugstad · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–1
  4. P1 16:54PITJeff CarterSHAssists: Drew O'Connor · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:23PITJeff CarterPPGWGAssists: Kris Letang, Reilly Smith · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:37PITJake GuentzelENAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Marcus Pettersson · Backhand, 0.79 xG2–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:48ARIMichael Kesselring: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:31PITErik Karlsson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 10:27ARILiam O'Brien: Interference2 min
  4. P1 10:31PITSidney Crosby: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 10:50ARINick Bjugstad: Tripping2 min
  6. P1 13:56PITTristan Jarry: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P1 15:47PITErik Karlsson: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 9:59PITJeff Carter: Boarding2 min
  9. P3 2:25ARIMichael Kesselring: High sticking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 10:57PITKris Letang: Holding2 min
  11. P3 12:32ARIJason Zucker: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Cooley
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIPIT
21Shots on goal43
2.6Expected goals5.4
59Shot attempts77
22Faceoffs won36
5Power plays5
10Penalty minutes12
22Hits25
16Blocked shots18
8Giveaways12
11Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Brien – Cooley – Kelemen5:00

    xG 0.15–0.08 (66%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  2. Kerfoot – Carcone – Cooley2:31

    xG 0.00–0.03 (3%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Zucker – Schmaltz – Keller11:55

    xG 0.60–0.69 (46%)attempts 14–16goals 0–0

  4. Kerfoot – Sanford – Carcone5:06

    xG 0.14–0.71 (16%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Stecher – Välimäki10:48

    xG 0.44–0.49 (47%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Dumba – Moser12:24

    xG 0.57–0.78 (42%)attempts 11–19goals 0–0

  3. Dermott – Kesselring9:56

    xG 0.27–0.68 (28%)attempts 9–16goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestEller – Hinostroza – Zohorna6:30

    xG 0.56–0.07 (89%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Guentzel – O'Connor12:20

    xG 1.20–0.71 (63%)attempts 19–12goals 0–0

  3. Malkin – Smith – Puustinen8:46

    xG 0.40–0.30 (57%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  4. Carter – Eller – Smith2:17

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Pettersson13:57

    xG 0.82–0.18 (82%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Graves11:38

    xG 1.15–0.87 (57%)attempts 21–14goals 0–0

  3. Joseph – Ludvig6:55

    xG 0.36–0.08 (81%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 5.4 xGARI 2.6 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #714 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.60 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 86% of the time.

PIT winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).