Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 7, 2024·Mullett Arena, Tempe

Minnesota Wild 5, Arizona Coyotes 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 78% of the time.

ARI winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN07111410528
ARI0701127225

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 1:51MINKirill KaprizovPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Brock Faber · Wrist, 0.26 xG1–0
  2. P3 1:21ARIClayton KellerPPAssists: Barrett Hayton, Nick Schmaltz · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:28ARIMichael CarconeAssists: Liam O'Brien, Jack McBain · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P3 2:00MINZach BogosianAssists: Ryan Hartman, Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–2
  5. P3 7:16MINJoel Eriksson EkGWGAssists: Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:48MINBrock FaberENAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Ryan Hartman · Wrist, 0.47 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:33MINConnor DewarENAssists: Jonas Brodin, Adam Beckman · Wrist, 0.78 xG5–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P2 1:42ARISean Durzi: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 2:09MINMarco Rossi: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P2 4:11MINDakota Mermis: Slashing2 min
  4. P3 1:10MINMarco Rossi: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P3 2:00ARILiam O'Brien: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  6. P3 19:51ARIPatrik Koch: Misconduct10 min
  7. P3 19:51ARIJoshua Brown: Misconduct10 min
  8. P3 19:51ARILiam O'Brien: Misconduct10 min
  9. P3 19:51MINVinni Lettieri: Misconduct10 min
  10. P3 19:51MINMason Shaw: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kerfoot won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINARI
28Shots on goal25
4.7Expected goals2.8
60Shot attempts64
28Faceoffs won26
2Power plays3
26Penalty minutes34
31Hits30
24Blocked shots15
9Giveaways12
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson Ek – Kaprizov – Boldy12:11

    xG 0.61–0.32 (66%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Lettieri – Shaw – Lucchini5:50

    xG 0.30–0.11 (73%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Gaudreau – Dewar – Beckman8:22

    xG 0.16–0.22 (42%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

  4. Zuccarello – Hartman – Rossi9:39

    xG 0.35–0.42 (46%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Chisholm15:51

    xG 0.88–0.72 (55%)attempts 17–15goals 1–1

  2. Brodin – Chisholm2:02

    xG 0.09–0.14 (38%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  3. Merrill – Mermis12:35

    xG 0.24–0.30 (45%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestSchmaltz – Keller – Hayton11:18

    xG 0.81–0.35 (70%)attempts 18–3goals 0–0

  2. O'Brien – Carcone – McBain6:34

    xG 0.17–0.09 (65%)attempts 12–4goals 1–0

  3. Kerfoot – Crouse – Maccelli13:07

    xG 0.42–0.35 (55%)attempts 9–16goals 0–0

  4. Carcone – Guenther – Cooley4:06

    xG 0.43–0.44 (49%)attempts 2–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrown – Dermott5:36

    xG 0.43–0.11 (81%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  2. Välimäki – Kesselring14:16

    xG 0.87–0.72 (55%)attempts 24–12goals 0–0

  3. Brown – Koch5:40

    xG 0.18–0.34 (35%)attempts 6–6goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 2.8 xGMIN 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #499 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.80 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 22% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 78% of the time.

ARI winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).