Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 16, 2024·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Arizona Coyotes 2, Calgary Flames 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 52% of the time.

CGY winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ARI0311111001225
CGY06082917330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 8:22ARISean DurziAssists: Nick Schmaltz, J.J. Moser · Slap, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P3 6:37ARILogan CooleyAssists: Sean Durzi, Clayton Keller · Deflected, 0.15 xG2–0
  3. P3 8:54CGYBlake ColemanAssists: Rasmus Andersson · Deflected, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P3 9:57CGYNazem KadriAssists: Martin Pospisil · Snap, 0.28 xG2–2
  5. OT 4:43CGYYegor SharangovichPPGWGAssists: Nazem Kadri, Elias Lindholm · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 3:51CGYElias Lindholm: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:45ARIAlexander Kerfoot: Delaying game face off violation2 min
  3. P1 16:28ARIMichael Kesselring: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 16:28ARIMichael Kesselring: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 16:28CGYJordan Oesterle: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 1:03CGYRasmus Andersson: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 5:18ARITroy Stecher: Interference2 min
  8. P2 11:53ARILiam O'Brien: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 4:23CGYNoah Hanifin: Tripping2 min
  10. OT 3:03ARIDylan Guenther: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against McBain
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARICGY
25Shots on goal30
3.0Expected goals3.0
63Shot attempts54
22Faceoffs won32
3Power plays5
12Penalty minutes8
17Hits12
12Blocked shots17
4Giveaways7
15Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestZucker – Kerfoot – Crouse5:00

    xG 0.52–0.04 (93%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  2. Schmaltz – Keller – McBain6:00

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  3. Kerfoot – Crouse – Maccelli4:28

    xG 0.06–0.01 (83%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Zucker – Bjugstad – O'Brien2:31

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStecher – Kesselring10:09

    xG 0.59–0.52 (53%)attempts 16–6goals 0–1

  2. Durzi – Moser14:36

    xG 0.35–0.28 (56%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  3. Dumba – Dermott13:42

    xG 0.14–0.48 (22%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestKadri – Pospisil – Zary10:33

    xG 0.57–0.20 (74%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  2. Greer – Ruzicka – Duehr3:40

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Backlund – Coleman – Mangiapane11:38

    xG 0.53–0.50 (51%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

  4. Lindholm – Dube – Sharangovich6:53

    xG 0.01–0.32 (3%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTanev – Hanifin16:14

    xG 0.40–0.29 (58%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

  2. Weegar – Andersson14:12

    xG 0.41–0.50 (45%)attempts 10–17goals 1–0

  3. Oesterle – DeSimone9:47

    xG 0.24–0.71 (25%)attempts 4–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.0 xGARI 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #375 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.88 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 7% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 52% of the time.

CGY winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).