Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 23, 2010·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Toronto Maple Leafs 2, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 79% of the time.

PHI winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR042703214
PHI214113213540

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:08PHIMike RichardsUnassisted · Snap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:59PHIVille LeinoPPAssists: Mike Richards, Chris Pronger · Tip-in, 0.17 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:35TORPhil KesselAssists: Nikolay Kulemin, Francois Beauchemin · Snap, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:21PHIBlair BettsGWGAssists: Darroll Powe · Snap, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P2 18:46TORClarke MacArthurAssists: Mike Komisarek · Wrist, 0.35 xG2–3
  6. P3 1:05PHIScott HartnellAssists: Mike Richards, Claude Giroux · Snap, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 7:47PHIDaniel BrièreUnassisted · Slap, 0.05 xG2–5
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 0:40PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 11:46PHIDarroll Powe: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 14:34PHIDaniel Carcillo: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 14:34TORMike Brown: Fighting5 min · PPG
  5. P1 18:14TORFredrik Sjostrom: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 4:21TORPhil Kessel: Closing hand on puck2 min
  7. P2 7:37TORKris Versteeg: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 11:35TORJean-Sebastien Giguere: Delaying game illegal play by goalie2 min
  9. P2 13:57PHIJeff Carter: Holding2 min
  10. P3 10:35TORMikhail Grabovski: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 12:30TORColby Armstrong: Boarding5 min
  12. P3 12:30TORColby Armstrong: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 12:30PHIAndrej Meszaros: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 18:03PHIJody Shelley: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← TOR attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Carter won the faceoff against Brent
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORPHI
14Shots on goal40
2.2Expected goals4.1
40Shot attempts68
23Faceoffs won31
4Power plays6
22Penalty minutes15
26Hits17
13Blocked shots18
8Giveaways9
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestGrabovski – Kessel – Kulemin5:05

    xG 0.28–0.15 (66%)attempts 5–7goals 1–1

  2. Orr – Mitchell – Brown6:53

    xG 0.06–0.07 (45%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. MacArthur – Versteeg – Bozak7:24

    xG 0.35–0.52 (40%)attempts 4–10goals 0–1

  4. MacArthur – Grabovski – Kulemin3:16

    xG 0.00–0.18 (0%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKomisarek – Gunnarsson9:06

    xG 0.60–0.46 (57%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

  2. Kaberle – Schenn12:59

    xG 0.16–0.56 (22%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

  3. Beauchemin – Phaneuf8:51

    xG 0.23–0.82 (22%)attempts 9–10goals 0–2

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestBrière – Hartnell – Leino9:39

    xG 0.91–0.39 (70%)attempts 17–8goals 1–0

  2. Shelley – Betts – Carcillo5:23

    xG 0.41–0.04 (90%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Zherdev – Carter – van Riemsdyk5:32

    xG 0.16–0.01 (92%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Richards – Giroux – Powe7:38

    xG 0.21–0.55 (28%)attempts 10–4goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Donnell – Meszaros11:08

    xG 0.47–0.03 (94%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Pronger – Carle7:55

    xG 0.39–0.05 (89%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. O'Donnell – Coburn2:15

    xG 0.13–0.01 (90%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 4.1 xGTOR 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHITOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #541 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.25 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 79% of the time.

PHI winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).