Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #10

Mike Richards

Age
41
Shoots
Left
Height
180 cm
Weight
89 kg
Born
Kenora, CAN
Draft
2003, round 1, #24 (PHI)

Career · 2009–10 to 2015–16

Games
459
Goals
102
Points
266
TOI per game
17:21
xGF% (5v5)
50.8%
Goals above expected
−14.8

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10PHI82313162−220:2423713.1%3028.9–
2010–11PHI81234366+1118:5318412.5%2022.253.0%
2011–12LAK74182644+318:5317110.5%1420.846.1%
2012–13LAK48122032−816:218214.6%159.651.9%
2013–14LAK82113041−616:591577.0%1222.151.8%
2014–15LAK5351116−1013:22637.9%37.549.2%
2015–16WSH39235−212:11464.3%05.855.0%
Total3 teams459102164266−1417:2194010.9%94116.850.8%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.511.5100200300400
10m12m14m16m18m20m22m100200300400Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2015–16 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd line

67th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd line
  • Goals /600.7766th pct
  • Assists /601.2480th pct
  • ixG /600.8882nd pct
  • Goals above expected−14.85th pct

Play-driving

2nd line
  • xGF% (5v5)50.8%65th pct
  • CF% (5v5)51.2%69th pct
  • Relative xGF%−3.923rd pct
  • Penalty diff /600.2669th pct

Usage

1st line
  • TOI per game17:2186th pct
  • PP time share41.3%76th pct
  • Offensive zone starts53.8%42nd pct
  • Quality of competition24.6%71st pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Richards wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2015–16, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1339+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

50.6%

3070–3001 · #81 of 193 regulars, 58th percentile

Against an average centre

50.9%

Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.

Wins above average

+52

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

13.2

6,071 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

48%1095 · +0.755%1214 · +2.446%740 · +2.155%271 · +1.143%190 · −0.960%294 · +1.042%246 · +1.254%1345 · +1.345%676 · +2.2Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone51.4% 1006–952
  • Neutral zone49.6% 1039–1055
  • Defensive zone50.8% 1025–994

By strength

  • Even strength50.4% 2392–2351
  • Power play53.9% 333–285
  • Shorthanded49.8% 327–329

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +16 after a win, −12 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.5 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–10137250.7%51.3%
2010–11121649.8%50.1%
2011–12106750.5%50.6%
2012–1344149.0%49.0%
2013–1490753.9%54.2%
2014–1559348.7%49.0%
2015–1647549.5%49.7%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−14.8 goals above expected

020406080100120100200300400Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−500+50+100