Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 30, 2010·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Buffalo Sabres 0, Dallas Stars 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 74% of the time.

DAL winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF07014013034
DAL113113215441

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:34DALJames NealPPGWGAssists: Mike Ribeiro, Brad Richards · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 18:20DALBrenden MorrowPPAssists: Brad Richards, Loui Eriksson · Tip-in, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P3 5:05DALSteve OttSHAssists: Jamie Benn · Wrist, 0.30 xG0–3
  4. P3 11:35DALTrevor DaleyAssists: Stephane Robidas · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:01BUFTyler Ennis: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 6:06BUFPatrick Kaleta: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 6:51BUFShaone Morrisonn: Interference2 min
  4. P1 10:41DALMatt Niskanen: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 12:17BUFThomas Vanek: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 17:49BUFCody McCormick: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 4:30DALToby Petersen: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 9:30BUFShaone Morrisonn: Interference2 min
  9. P3 19:17BUFCody McCormick: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Niedermayer won the faceoff against Richards
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFDAL
34Shots on goal41
2.9Expected goals4.6
59Shot attempts74
24Faceoffs won31
2Power plays7
14Penalty minutes4
38Hits30
7Blocked shots13
14Giveaways13
6Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestHecht – Connolly – McCormick6:12

    xG 0.72–0.30 (71%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Grier – Gaustad – Kaleta2:40

    xG 0.46–0.16 (74%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Niedermayer – Grier – Adam3:51

    xG 0.09–0.01 (89%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Hecht – Roy – Vanek2:52

    xG 0.14–0.13 (52%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Montador16:27

    xG 1.02–0.48 (68%)attempts 22–13goals 0–0

  2. Sekera – Butler9:06

    xG 0.43–0.50 (46%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  3. Sekera – Myers4:08

    xG 0.27–0.43 (39%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. Ott – Burish – Wandell7:10

    xG 0.35–0.31 (53%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  2. Petersen – Sutherby – Segal7:54

    xG 0.14–0.11 (55%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Richards – Eriksson – Neal12:20

    xG 0.86–0.95 (47%)attempts 20–16goals 0–0

  4. Morrow – Ribeiro – Benn8:08

    xG 0.45–0.65 (41%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSkrastins – Niskanen11:50

    xG 0.68–0.33 (67%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Daley – Fistric15:56

    xG 1.11–1.14 (49%)attempts 22–21goals 0–0

  3. Robidas – Grossmann14:40

    xG 0.76–0.90 (46%)attempts 15–20goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 4.6 xGBUF 2.9 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 5/100 · #1146 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.61 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 74% of the time.

DAL winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).