Skip to content
Ice Lab

Left wing · #10

Brenden Morrow

Age
47
Shoots
Left
Height
180 cm
Weight
96 kg
Born
Carlyle, CAN
Draft
1997, round 1, #25 (DAL)

Career · 2009–10 to 2014–15

Games
400
Goals
92
Points
186
TOI per game
15:24
xGF% (5v5)
48.2%
Goals above expected
+7.4

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10DAL76202646−319:1015512.9%2022.6–
2010–11DAL82332356−319:1420915.8%1330.148.8%
2011–12DAL57111526+117:028812.5%711.446.1%
2012–13DAL296511−814:553119.4%25.242.3%
2012–13PIT156814+514:442425.0%23.650.5%
2012–13All teams44121325−314:525521.8%48.945.1%
2013–14STL71131225+111:545623.2%76.448.3%
2014–15TBL70358−19:202810.7%05.253.2%
Total4 teams4009294186−815:2459115.6%5184.648.2%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.511.550100150200250300350400
10m15m20m50100150200250300350400Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd line

53rd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

1st line
  • Goals /600.9079th pct
  • Assists /600.9254th pct
  • ixG /600.8273rd pct
  • Goals above expected+7.485th pct

Play-driving

4th line
  • xGF% (5v5)48.2%40th pct
  • CF% (5v5)48.3%37th pct
  • Relative xGF%−3.625th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.3113th pct

Usage

2nd line
  • TOI per game15:2465th pct
  • PP time share34.2%68th pct
  • Offensive zone starts63.1%72nd pct
  • Quality of competition24.3%59th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Morrow wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2014–15, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1134+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

35.2%

43–79 · below the 1134 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

35.9%

Opponents won 50.7% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.3% against them.

Wins above average

−17

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

1.2

122 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

17%6 · +0.239%33 · +5.040%30 · +4.10%1 · –25%4 · −2.550%2 · +3.729%7 · +1.637%19 · +0.230%20 · +1.1Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone38.7% 24–38
  • Neutral zone25.0% 5–15
  • Defensive zone35.0% 14–26

By strength

  • Even strength30.0% 27–63
  • Power play50.0% 10–10
  • Shorthanded50.0% 6–6

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +23 after a win, −19 after a loss. Each win was worth 2.8 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–103129.0%30.4%
2010–11119.1%11.3%
2011–122740.7%42.2%
2012–132454.2%54.4%
2013–142931.0%30.0%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+7.4 goals above expected

02040608010050100150200250300350400Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−40−200+20+40+60+80+100+120