Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #63

Dave Bolland

Age
40
Shoots
Right
Height
183 cm
Weight
83 kg
Born
Mimico, CAN
Draft
2004, round 2, #32 (CHI)

Career · 2009–10 to 2015–16

Games
312
Goals
62
Points
144
TOI per game
16:27
xGF% (5v5)
45.3%
Goals above expected
+10.2

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10CHI3961016+517:225211.5%25.6–
2010–11CHI61152237+1117:3910214.7%1211.149.7%
2011–12CHI76191837016:3012615.1%1213.545.3%
2012–13CHI357714−716:204615.2%35.142.7%
2013–14TOR238412−114:283324.2%24.843.5%
2014–15FLA5361723+416:21767.9%58.546.4%
2015–16FLA25145−214:06263.8%33.335.6%
Total3 teams3126282144+1016:2746113.4%3951.845.3%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.8150100150200250300
10m12m14m16m18m20m50100150200250300Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2015–16 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd line

42nd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd line
  • Goals /600.7361st pct
  • Assists /600.9660th pct
  • ixG /600.6136th pct
  • Goals above expected+10.289th pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)45.3%18th pct
  • CF% (5v5)47.2%30th pct
  • Relative xGF%−7.09th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.625th pct

Usage

2nd line
  • TOI per game16:2777th pct
  • PP time share31.0%64th pct
  • Offensive zone starts39.1%14th pct
  • Quality of competition24.9%81st pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Bolland wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2015–16, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1339+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

46.5%

2272–2619 · #160 of 193 regulars, 17th percentile

Against an average centre

46.7%

Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.

Wins above average

−161

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

15.7

4,891 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

45%867 · 0.046%591 · +1.152%689 · +1.545%184 · +1.044%213 · +0.647%239 · +1.050%243 · −0.346%707 · +2.045%1158 · +1.5Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone48.7% 620–653
  • Neutral zone45.6% 797–949
  • Defensive zone45.7% 855–1017

By strength

  • Even strength46.9% 1794–2028
  • Power play50.9% 207–200
  • Shorthanded41.3% 267–380

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +8 after a win, −15 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.1 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–1055349.5%49.2%
2010–11100845.1%45.6%
2011–12120348.4%48.6%
2012–1351846.1%47.1%
2013–1433745.1%46.0%
2014–1593144.5%44.4%
2015–1634145.7%45.7%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+10.2 goals above expected

020406050100150200250300Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−500+50+100