- Age
- 37
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 180 cm
- Weight
- 85 kg
- Born
- Laval, CAN
- Draft
- 2007, round 3, #63 (ANA)
2011–12
- Games
- 29
- Goals
- 1
- Points
- 4
- TOI per game
- 10:49
- xGF% (5v5)
- 43.4%
- Goals above expected
- −0.3
Season
The regular-season line, by team for traded players.
| 2011–12 |   ANA | 29 | 1 | 3 | 4 | −4 | 10:49 | 14 | 7.1% | 0 | 1.3 | 43.4% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How this season compares with everyone else at the position, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
4th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.196th pct
- Assists /600.5721st pct
- ixG /600.251st pct
- Goals above expected−0.352nd pct
Play-driving
Extra / AHL- xGF% (5v5)43.4%10th pct
- CF% (5v5)43.8%9th pct
- Relative xGF%−3.329th pct
- Penalty diff /60-1.152nd pct
Usage
Extra / AHL- TOI per game10:4918th pct
- PP time share3.3%23rd pct
- Offensive zone starts33.0%7th pct
- Quality of competition22.4%7th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Macenauer wins the draw this season, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 205+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
49.8%
113–114 · #87 of 173 regulars, 50th percentile
Against an average centre
51.0%
Opponents won 51.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 48.7% against them.
Wins above average
+2
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
7.8
227 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone52.4% 33–30
- Neutral zone46.8% 36–41
- Defensive zone50.6% 44–43
By strength
- Even strength51.1% 89–85
- Power play100.0% 1–0
- Shorthanded44.7% 21–26
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +20 after a win, −28 after a loss. Each win was worth 2.1 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Jerred Smithson45.5% 5–6
- Colin Fraser60.0% 6–4
- Martin Hanzal25.0% 2–6
- Mikko Koivu37.5% 3–5
- Jamal Mayers42.9% 3–4
- Kyle Brodziak71.4% 5–2
- Jarret Stoll57.1% 4–3
- Joe Thornton16.7% 1–5
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−0.3 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games