Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
45
Shoots
Left
Height
183 cm
Weight
97 kg
Born
Niagara on the Lake, CAN
Draft
Undrafted

Career · 2009–10 to 2013–14

Games
307
Goals
8
Points
22
TOI per game
8:37
xGF% (5v5)
37.5%
Goals above expected
−7.9

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10TBL74235−118:08414.9%14.9–
2010–11NYI82279−1410:11563.6%06.035.1%
2011–12OTT55325−47:51348.8%12.339.5%
2012–13MIN37000−48:26180.0%01.339.9%
2013–14MIN36112−57:17156.7%00.845.0%
2013–14BUF23011−48:5360.0%00.632.5%
2013–14All teams59123−97:54214.8%01.340.1%
Total5 teams30781422−428:371704.7%215.937.5%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.450100150200250300
6m8m10m12m50100150200250300Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2013–14 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

Extra / AHL

0th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

Extra / AHL
  • Goals /600.183rd pct
  • Assists /600.323rd pct
  • ixG /600.363rd pct
  • Goals above expected−7.912th pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)37.5%2nd pct
  • CF% (5v5)40.9%2nd pct
  • Relative xGF%−11.71st pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.843rd pct

Usage

Extra / AHL
  • TOI per game8:377th pct
  • PP time share2.7%20th pct
  • Offensive zone starts25.9%2nd pct
  • Quality of competition22.8%10th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Konopka wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2013–14, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 929+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

59.6%

1643–1116 · #3 of 176 regulars, 99th percentile

Against an average centre

59.6%

Opponents won 50.0% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.0% against them.

Wins above average

+264

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

9.0

2,759 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

62%354 · 0.066%290 · +2.057%208 · +2.463%88 · +0.749%85 · +0.268%105 · 0.056%79 · +0.163%895 · +1.451%655 · +2.3Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone62.0% 312–191
  • Neutral zone60.8% 431–278
  • Defensive zone58.2% 900–647

By strength

  • Even strength60.6% 1274–828
  • Power play65.7% 71–37
  • Shorthanded53.6% 287–248

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +4 after a win, −25 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.5 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–1045662.3%62.1%
2010–11107557.7%57.8%
2011–1239458.9%58.9%
2012–1326760.7%60.6%
2013–1456760.8%60.8%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−7.9 goals above expected

05101550100150200250300Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60+80+100