Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 11, 2010·Verizon Center, Washington

Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Washington Capitals 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 66% of the time.

WSH winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL113012216341
WSH0828410626

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:27TBLTeddy PurcellAssists: Sean Bergenheim, Nate Thompson · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:21WSHTom PotiAssists: Alexander Semin, Nicklas Backstrom · Backhand, 0.20 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:51WSHMike KnubleAssists: Brooks Laich, Tomas Fleischmann · Backhand, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P3 2:43TBLRyan MalonePPAssists: Martin St. Louis, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.48 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:33WSHAlexander SeminPPAssists: Nicklas Backstrom, Alex Ovechkin · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P3 10:46WSHAlexander SeminGWGAssists: Nicklas Backstrom, Alex Ovechkin · Slap, 0.05 xG2–4
  7. P3 12:43TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Dominic Moore, Martin St. Louis · Snap, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 15:08WSHAlex OvechkinAssists: Alexander Semin, Jeff Schultz · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:44WSHAlexander SeminENAssists: Nicklas Backstrom, John Carlson · Wrist, 0.59 xG3–6
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 14:44WSHMike Knuble: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 17:12WSHJohn Carlson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P2 10:28WSHBrooks Laich: Interference2 min
  4. P2 14:36WSHMatt Bradley: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 14:36TBLAdam Hall: Fighting5 min
  6. P3 2:03WSHJohn Erskine: Boarding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 4:17TBLDominic Moore: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
47% to win53% to win
← TBL attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gordon won the faceoff against Hall
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLWSH
41Shots on goal26
3.7Expected goals2.7
70Shot attempts47
31Faceoffs won40
4Power plays1
7Penalty minutes13
18Hits28
13Blocked shots17
7Giveaways13
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestSt. Louis – Hall – Stamkos7:33

    xG 0.55–0.25 (69%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

  2. Bergenheim – Thompson – Purcell2:19

    xG 0.28–0.08 (77%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Moore – Stamkos3:02

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  4. Malone – Bergenheim – Purcell2:13

    xG 0.19–0.05 (79%)attempts 9–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestClark – Hedman11:42

    xG 0.39–0.08 (83%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  2. Kubina – Hedman3:17

    xG 0.13–0.05 (72%)attempts 6–1goals 0–1

  3. Kubina – Lundin10:11

    xG 0.25–0.18 (59%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestSemin – Ovechkin – Backstrom8:45

    xG 0.64–0.28 (69%)attempts 10–8goals 2–0

  2. Chimera – Fleischmann – Fehr3:58

    xG 0.18–0.19 (48%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  3. Knuble – Laich – Fleischmann4:18

    xG 0.11–0.15 (43%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  4. Laich – Fleischmann – Semin3:44

    xG 0.17–0.31 (35%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Alzner – Carlson15:23

    xG 0.43–0.51 (46%)attempts 15–14goals 1–0

  2. Schultz – Green18:26

    xG 0.35–0.70 (33%)attempts 13–16goals 1–1

  3. Poti – Erskine13:15

    xG 0.39–0.82 (32%)attempts 7–17goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 2.7 xGTBL 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #200 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.86 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 66% of the time.

WSH winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).