Sat, Nov 27, 2010·Scotiabank Place, Ottawa
Toronto Maple Leafs 0, Ottawa Senators 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 77% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 08 | 011 | 010 | 029 |
| OTT | 111 | 210 | 07 | 328 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 15:57OTTAlex KovalevPPGWGAssists: Mike Fisher · Wrist, 0.44 xG0–1
- P2 12:51OTTMike FisherAssists: Milan Michalek, Alex Kovalev · Backhand, 0.08 xG0–2
- P2 19:00OTTMike FisherAssists: Alex Kovalev, Milan Michalek · Snap, 0.23 xG0–3
Penalties (4)
- P1 14:12TORFredrik Sjostrom: Interference2 min · PPG
- P2 4:40OTTChris Phillips: Holding2 min
- P3 4:48OTTMilan Michalek: Slashing2 min
- P3 18:44OTTAlex Kovalev: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Bozak won the faceoff against Spezza
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forward lines
- bestMacArthur – Grabovski – Kessel5:28
xG 0.21–0.06 (77%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0
- Versteeg – Kulemin – Kadri6:17
xG 0.50–0.41 (55%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1
- Kessel – Bozak – Kadri9:11
xG 0.18–0.18 (50%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0
- MacArthur – Grabovski – Kulemin7:58
xG 0.33–0.40 (45%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestBeauchemin – Komisarek12:05
xG 0.71–0.30 (70%)attempts 12–7goals 0–1
- Beauchemin – Schenn2:08
xG 0.04–0.04 (52%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0
- Beauchemin – Gunnarsson4:18
xG 0.04–0.05 (44%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
Ottawa Senators
Forward lines
- bestAlfredsson – Spezza – Regin11:54
xG 0.76–0.22 (78%)attempts 11–15goals 0–0
- Kovalev – Fisher – Michalek16:03
xG 0.68–0.41 (62%)attempts 10–16goals 2–0
- Ruutu – Shannon – Winchester7:40
xG 0.27–0.09 (75%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0
- Neil – Kelly – Foligno9:34
xG 0.33–0.85 (28%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestCarkner – Campoli12:58
xG 0.96–0.10 (90%)attempts 16–7goals 0–0
- Kuba – Karlsson17:56
xG 0.75–0.65 (54%)attempts 14–25goals 2–0
- Gonchar – Phillips17:44
xG 0.36–0.79 (31%)attempts 17–15goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 77% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (OTT − TOR), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).