Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 11, 2010·HSBC Arena, Buffalo

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Buffalo Sabres 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 61% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT2805311524
BUF114012110236

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:43PITDustin JeffreyAssists: Ben Lovejoy, Craig Adams · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:31PITArron AshamAssists: Max Talbot · Slap, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P1 15:49BUFTyler EnnisPPAssists: Derek Roy, Thomas Vanek · Wrist, 0.57 xG2–1
  4. P3 12:09PITAlex GoligoskiGWGAssists: Pascal Dupuis, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P3 13:00BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Tyler Myers, Andrej Sekera · Backhand, 0.22 xG3–2
  6. P3 16:43PITMike RuppAssists: Dustin Jeffrey · Wrist, 0.24 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:17PITMatt CookeENAssists: Craig Adams · Wrist, 0.58 xG5–2
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 0:12BUFAndrej Sekera: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 10:53PITBen Lovejoy: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 14:45PITCraig Adams: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P1 15:23PITPascal Dupuis: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 15:49PITMatt Cooke: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 15:49BUFPaul Gaustad: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 15:49PITBrooks Orpik: Roughing2 min
  8. P1 15:49BUFJason Pominville: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 6:14PITMarc-Andre Fleury: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 9:34BUFSteve Montador: Slashing2 min
  11. P2 11:47BUFMike Weber: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 11:47BUFMike Weber: Roughing2 min
  13. P2 11:47PITSidney Crosby: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 0:24PITBrooks Orpik: Interference2 min
  15. P3 6:51BUFThomas Vanek: High sticking2 min
  16. P3 11:03BUFNathan Gerbe: Slashing2 min
  17. P3 11:03PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Roy won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBUF
24Shots on goal36
2.7Expected goals3.3
42Shot attempts54
36Faceoffs won19
4Power plays5
21Penalty minutes19
18Hits16
10Blocked shots11
9Giveaways5
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestAdams – Rupp – Jeffrey4:44

    xG 0.43–0.10 (81%)attempts 4–5goals 2–0

  2. Asham – Cooke – Talbot6:35

    xG 0.20–0.13 (61%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  3. Kennedy – Conner – Letestu6:36

    xG 0.23–0.30 (44%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  4. Dupuis – Kunitz – Crosby10:04

    xG 0.11–0.72 (13%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Michalek9:16

    xG 0.51–0.30 (63%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  2. Orpik – Michalek2:12

    xG 0.05–0.02 (70%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Goligoski – Lovejoy6:47

    xG 0.36–0.42 (47%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestGrier – Gaustad – McCormick5:36

    xG 0.43–0.14 (76%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  2. Roy – Vanek – Gerbe5:43

    xG 0.21–0.05 (81%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

  3. Hecht – Kaleta – Ennis4:58

    xG 0.25–0.20 (55%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Grier – Gaustad – Gerbe2:11

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSekera – Myers11:17

    xG 0.45–0.17 (73%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Butler – Weber8:45

    xG 0.27–0.24 (53%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  3. Leopold – Montador13:44

    xG 0.54–0.56 (49%)attempts 13–17goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.3 xGPIT 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #544 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.22 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 61% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).