Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 21, 2010·HSBC Arena, Buffalo

Anaheim Ducks 2, Buffalo Sabres 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 87% of the time.

BUF winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA0409210223
BUF317114111542

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:43BUFDrew StaffordPPAssists: Derek Roy, Tyler Myers · Backhand, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:05BUFNathan GerbeAssists: Craig Rivet, Paul Gaustad · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:57BUFTyler EnnisPPGWGAssists: Andrej Sekera, Jordan Leopold · Wrist, 0.27 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:40BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Derek Roy, Jordan Leopold · Snap, 0.11 xG0–4
  5. P3 15:36ANACorey PerryPPAssists: Teemu Selanne, Cam Fowler · Backhand, 0.16 xG1–4
  6. P3 17:03BUFCraig RivetAssists: Rob Niedermayer · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–5
  7. P3 19:51ANACorey PerryPPAssists: Teemu Selanne, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–5
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 3:45ANAJason Blake: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:36ANAJason Blake: Boarding5 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:36ANAJason Blake: Game misconduct10 min
  4. P2 0:01ANARyan Getzlaf: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 0:01BUFCody McCormick: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 0:06ANAKyle Chipchura: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 0:06BUFPaul Gaustad: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 0:30BUFSteve Montador: Cross checking2 min
  9. P2 9:58BUFMike Weber: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 9:58ANAGeorge Parros: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 16:30BUFJochen Hecht: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 1:09ANACam Fowler: Holding the stick2 min
  13. P3 6:06ANACorey Perry: Slashing2 min
  14. P3 15:22BUFJochen Hecht: Hooking2 min · PPG
  15. P3 18:58BUFSteve Montador: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against McCormick
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANABUF
23Shots on goal42
1.4Expected goals3.9
42Shot attempts68
22Faceoffs won33
4Power plays5
36Penalty minutes23
16Hits19
16Blocked shots14
7Giveaways12
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Blake – Parros – Chipchura2:39

    xG 0.04–0.05 (45%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Getzlaf – Perry – Ryan11:29

    xG 0.39–0.44 (47%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

  3. Green – Lupul – Chipchura2:20

    xG 0.05–0.13 (29%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Marchant – Green – Lupul2:49

    xG 0.10–0.21 (32%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Sutton – Lilja4:36

    xG 0.10–0.13 (44%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Sbisa – Fowler7:47

    xG 0.13–0.28 (31%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

  3. Lilja – Fowler7:27

    xG 0.24–0.63 (27%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestRoy – Vanek – Ennis7:49

    xG 1.01–0.06 (94%)attempts 11–3goals 1–0

  2. Hecht – Pominville – Stafford10:44

    xG 0.80–0.52 (61%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  3. Niedermayer – Grier – McCormick3:45

    xG 0.09–0.03 (76%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  4. Niedermayer – Gaustad – McCormick2:01

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Montador16:08

    xG 1.31–0.27 (83%)attempts 18–12goals 1–0

  2. Rivet – Weber9:51

    xG 0.52–0.18 (74%)attempts 12–6goals 2–0

  3. Sekera – Myers12:29

    xG 0.35–0.42 (46%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.9 xGANA 1.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #914 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.50 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 87% of the time.

BUF winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).