Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 26, 2010·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Detroit Red Wings 4, Minnesota Wild 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 80% of the time.

MIN winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DET2132905427
MIN040518117

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:38DETHenrik ZetterbergAssists: Niklas Kronwall, Johan Franzen · Deflected, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:59DETDaniel ClearyGWGAssists: Valtteri Filppula · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P2 5:30DETKris DraperAssists: Niklas Kronwall, Jonathan Ericsson · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–0
  4. P2 13:50DETTomas HolmstromPPAssists: Henrik Zetterberg, Nicklas Lidstrom · Backhand, 0.43 xG4–0
  5. P3 16:20MINBrent BurnsPPAssists: Martin Havlat, Patrick O'Sullivan · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–1
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 1:14MINChuck Kobasew: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 2:42DETTomas Holmstrom: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 2:42MINMarek Zidlicky: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 5:03DETJonathan Ericsson: Interference2 min
  5. P1 9:37MINMartin Havlat: Delaying game bench face off violation2 min
  6. P1 9:46DETTomas Holmstrom: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  7. P1 14:27DETDaniel Cleary: Hooking2 min
  8. P1 15:45MINAndrew Brunette: Elbowing2 min
  9. P2 8:33DETJonathan Ericsson: Tripping2 min
  10. P2 12:53MINKyle Brodziak: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  11. P3 0:54DETTodd Bertuzzi: Holding2 min
  12. P3 11:42MINGreg Zanon: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 14:39DETKris Draper: Hooking2 min · PPG
  14. P3 17:43MINMartin Havlat: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← DET attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Madden won the faceoff against Filppula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETMIN
27Shots on goal17
2.9Expected goals1.3
48Shot attempts35
31Faceoffs won26
6Power plays6
14Penalty minutes14
13Hits15
9Blocked shots6
5Giveaways8
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestBertuzzi – Cleary – Filppula9:52

    xG 0.50–0.18 (73%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0

  2. Draper – Eaves – Helm7:21

    xG 0.31–0.11 (74%)attempts 4–8goals 1–0

  3. Holmstrom – Zetterberg – Franzen8:24

    xG 0.21–0.07 (76%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  4. Hudler – Miller – Abdelkader4:56

    xG 0.04–0.04 (50%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKronwall – Kindl7:06

    xG 0.28–0.04 (86%)attempts 8–2goals 2–0

  2. Lidstrom – Stuart9:30

    xG 0.25–0.08 (76%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Ericsson – Kindl2:40

    xG 0.15–0.05 (77%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. Cullen – Miettinen – O'Sullivan2:52

    xG 0.07–0.13 (37%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  2. Brunette – Koivu – Kobasew7:12

    xG 0.03–0.14 (20%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Havlat – Bouchard – Brodziak3:20

    xG 0.17–0.30 (36%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

  4. Madden – Nystrom – Clutterbuck7:17

    xG 0.02–0.31 (6%)attempts 2–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Stoner – Spurgeon7:26

    xG 0.11–0.21 (34%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  2. Burns – Scandella12:50

    xG 0.06–0.30 (16%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

  3. Zanon – Zidlicky12:42

    xG 0.26–0.66 (29%)attempts 7–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.3 xGDET 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINDET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1000 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.65 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 80% of the time.

MIN winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).