Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 28, 2010·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Atlanta Thrashers 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 55% of the time.

PIT winsATL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ATL21505114334
PIT21111639636

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:47ATLEvander KaneAssists: Bryan Little, Alexander Burmistrov · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:34PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Kris Letang · Snap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:18ATLDustin ByfuglienPPAssists: Toby Enstrom, Bryan Little · Slap, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:34PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:38PITCraig AdamsSHAssists: Matt Cooke · Snap, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P3 0:09PITChris KunitzGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Pascal Dupuis · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–4
  7. P3 13:00PITMark LetestuUnassisted · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–5
  8. P3 16:16PITMatt CookeAssists: Sidney Crosby, Zbynek Michalek · Tip-in, 0.25 xG2–6
  9. P3 16:51ATLEric BoultonAssists: Jim Slater, Chris Thorburn · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–6
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 2:02ATLFreddy Modin: Interference2 min
  2. P1 10:10ATLToby Enstrom: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:44PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 14:29PITMatt Cooke: Kneeing2 min · PPG
  5. P1 16:04PITAlex Goligoski: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 7:41ATLBen Eager: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 7:41PITArron Asham: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 11:01PITBrooks Orpik: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 15:38ATLAnthony Stewart: Too many men on the ice2 min
  10. P3 1:34PITMatt Cooke: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 2:20PITKris Letang: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  12. P3 7:19PITMatt Cooke: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 13:57PITPascal Dupuis: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ATL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← ATL attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Peverley
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ATLPIT
34Shots on goal36
2.7Expected goals3.0
58Shot attempts53
34Faceoffs won29
8Power plays3
8Penalty minutes18
12Hits17
7Blocked shots9
4Giveaways9
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Atlanta Thrashers

Forward lines

  1. bestLittle – Kane – Burmistrov7:56

    xG 0.98–0.67 (59%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  2. Boulton – Thorburn – Slater8:09

    xG 0.36–0.32 (53%)attempts 5–7goals 1–1

  3. Stewart – Ladd – Peverley7:01

    xG 0.16–0.29 (36%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  4. Modin – Eager – Cormier9:02

    xG 0.07–0.30 (20%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSopel – Hainsey9:25

    xG 0.85–0.46 (65%)attempts 9–11goals 1–1

  2. Enstrom – Byfuglien14:44

    xG 0.72–0.43 (62%)attempts 17–11goals 1–0

  3. Oduya – Bogosian12:18

    xG 0.07–0.88 (7%)attempts 3–13goals 0–2

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKennedy – Conner – Letestu9:11

    xG 0.43–0.07 (86%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  2. Dupuis – Kunitz – Crosby5:16

    xG 0.34–0.13 (72%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  3. Kunitz – Malkin – Crosby3:23

    xG 0.28–0.09 (75%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  4. Cooke – Talbot – Malkin5:57

    xG 0.55–0.39 (59%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Michalek9:05

    xG 0.48–0.03 (94%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  2. Goligoski – Lovejoy7:40

    xG 0.67–0.24 (74%)attempts 10–3goals 1–1

  3. Orpik – Letang11:41

    xG 0.20–0.64 (24%)attempts 5–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.0 xGATL 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITATL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it ATL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #335 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.53 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
ATL 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 55% of the time.

PIT winsATL wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − ATL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).