Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 28, 2010·St. Pete Times Forum, Tampa

Boston Bruins 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 67% of the time.

TBL winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS11014215429
TBL11219113334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:28BOSMichael RyderPPAssists: Mark Recchi, Dennis Seidenberg · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:10TBLSteven StamkosPPAssists: Brett Clark, Ryan Malone · Tip-in, 0.28 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:27BOSSteven KampferAssists: Marc Savard, Nathan Horton · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:02TBLVincent LecavalierAssists: Sean Bergenheim, Pavel Kubina · Wrap-around, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:00BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Shawn Thornton, Gregory Campbell · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P3 10:50TBLMartin St. LouisAssists: Steven Stamkos, Pavel Kubina · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:40BOSMark RecchiPPGWGAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Dennis Seidenberg · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–3
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 0:20TBLSean Bergenheim: Roughing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 0:20BOSBrad Marchand: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 0:20TBLSean Bergenheim: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 6:44BOSAdam McQuaid: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 11:31BOSMilan Lucic: Hooking2 min
  6. P1 11:36TBLSteven Stamkos: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 1:20TBLSteven Stamkos: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P2 7:58TBLVictor Hedman: Holding2 min
  9. P2 10:04BOSBlake Wheeler: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 10:20TBLTeddy Purcell: Holding2 min
  11. P2 15:06BOSPatrice Bergeron: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 3:53BOSMilan Lucic: Interference2 min
  13. P3 18:10TBLSteven Stamkos: Boarding2 min · PPG
  14. P3 18:10TBLSean Bergenheim: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 18:10BOSBrad Marchand: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← BOS attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lecavalier won the faceoff against Campbell
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSTBL
29Shots on goal34
1.6Expected goals2.5
55Shot attempts63
31Faceoffs won37
6Power plays5
14Penalty minutes16
29Hits24
15Blocked shots17
6Giveaways8
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestRyder – Wheeler – Krejci12:43

    xG 0.43–0.37 (54%)attempts 11–15goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Campbell – Marchand7:51

    xG 0.24–0.19 (55%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  3. Recchi – Bergeron – Seguin8:53

    xG 0.17–0.42 (29%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  4. Savard – Horton – Lucic8:41

    xG 0.10–0.62 (13%)attempts 10–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Ference – Seidenberg3:18

    xG 0.07–0.03 (69%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Chara – Ference2:24

    xG 0.06–0.02 (71%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Ference – Boychuk2:34

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestSt. Louis – Malone – Stamkos7:48

    xG 0.65–0.09 (88%)attempts 19–5goals 1–0

  2. Hall – Thompson – Tyrell8:15

    xG 0.26–0.15 (63%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Lecavalier – Gagne – Bergenheim11:20

    xG 0.32–0.37 (46%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

  4. Moore – Ritola – Purcell6:08

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOhlund – Hedman2:43

    xG 0.34–0.01 (96%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Ohlund – Kubina2:49

    xG 0.25–0.07 (79%)attempts 4–3goals 1–1

  3. Kubina – Smaby6:03

    xG 0.21–0.06 (76%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.5 xGBOS 1.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #117 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.38 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 67% of the time.

TBL winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).