Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 1, 2011·HSBC Arena, Buffalo

Boston Bruins 6, Buffalo Sabres 7 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 52% of the time.

BUF winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BOS411013211052640
BUF31621415003735

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:29BOSAndrew FerenceAssists: Adam McQuaid, Marc Savard · Slap, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P1 2:06BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Thomas Vanek, Mike Weber · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 2:49BOSDennis SeidenbergUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P1 5:36BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Johnny Boychuk, Mark Recchi · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P1 13:45BUFThomas VanekAssists: Tim Connolly, Jason Pominville · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P1 14:15BOSZdeno CharaSHAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Mark Recchi · Wrist, 0.18 xG4–2
  7. P1 19:19BUFDrew StaffordUnassisted · Wrist, 0.38 xG4–3
  8. P2 6:17BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Paul Gaustad · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–4
  9. P2 17:43BUFJason PominvillePPAssists: Andrej Sekera, Jochen Hecht · Slap, 0.02 xG4–5
  10. P3 3:08BOSTyler SeguinAssists: Daniel Paille · Slap, 0.03 xG5–5
  11. P3 7:06BOSSteven KampferAssists: Tyler Seguin, Zdeno Chara · Tip-in, 0.17 xG6–5
  12. P3 19:32BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Tim Connolly, Jason Pominville · Backhand, 0.13 xG6–6

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Drew Stafford scored
  2. 2. BOS Michael Ryder scored
  3. 3. BUF Thomas Vanek scored
  4. 4. BOS Tyler Seguin scored
  5. 5. BUF Tyler Ennis scored
  6. 6. BOS Zdeno Chara stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 8:30BOSBlake Wheeler: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 10:56BUFCody McCormick: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 10:56BOSAdam McQuaid: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 14:01BOSMarc Savard: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 0:22BOSMark Recchi: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 4:06BUFDrew Stafford: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 17:12BOSJohnny Boychuk: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P3 3:42BUFDrew Stafford: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win53% to win
← BOS attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Connolly won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSBUF
40Shots on goal35
2.6Expected goals2.6
66Shot attempts57
40Faceoffs won33
2Power plays4
13Penalty minutes9
8Hits21
13Blocked shots14
6Giveaways7
2Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Paille – Seguin9:20

    xG 0.51–0.18 (74%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  2. Horton – Wheeler – Krejci4:02

    xG 0.19–0.07 (73%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Recchi – Bergeron – Marchand11:28

    xG 0.34–0.36 (49%)attempts 11–8goals 2–1

  4. Savard – Ryder – Lucic3:19

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFerence – Boychuk3:19

    xG 0.51–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Seidenberg – Kampfer9:46

    xG 0.43–0.13 (77%)attempts 14–5goals 2–0

  3. Ference – Seidenberg2:40

    xG 0.18–0.03 (84%)attempts 6–2goals 1–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestNiedermayer – Hecht – Stafford8:49

    xG 0.46–0.37 (56%)attempts 5–12goals 1–2

  2. Hecht – Stafford – Ennis3:06

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Grier – Gaustad – McCormick9:31

    xG 0.28–0.37 (43%)attempts 9–14goals 0–1

  4. Connolly – Pominville – Vanek11:35

    xG 0.62–0.71 (47%)attempts 11–10goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMorrisonn – Weber13:24

    xG 0.41–0.27 (61%)attempts 10–7goals 2–0

  2. Sekera – Myers10:51

    xG 0.74–0.86 (46%)attempts 11–12goals 1–2

  3. Rivet – Sekera3:34

    xG 0.02–0.22 (7%)attempts 1–7goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.6 xGBOS 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #2 of 1230 this seasonSwing 3.59 · 12 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 52% of the time.

BUF winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).