Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 4, 2011·Pepsi Center, Denver

Buffalo Sabres 3, Colorado Avalanche 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 65% of the time.

COL winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF1801022002340
COL290811116434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:16COLDaniel WinnikAssists: TJ Galiardi, Peter Budaj · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:49BUFThomas VanekPPAssists: Drew Stafford, Tim Connolly · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:03COLRyan O'ReillySHAssists: Daniel Winnik · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P3 4:28BUFJochen HechtAssists: Jason Pominville, Thomas Vanek · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:31BUFSteve MontadorAssists: Drew Stafford, Paul Gaustad · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 6:02COLMatt DucheneAssists: Tomas Fleischmann, Milan Hejduk · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:17COLDavid JonesPPGWGAssists: Tomas Fleischmann, Ryan Wilson · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:02BUFAndrej Sekera: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 9:06BUFPaul Gaustad: Interference2 min
  3. P1 14:37COLRyan O'Byrne: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:20BUFShaone Morrisonn: Interference2 min
  5. P1 19:25COLTomas Fleischmann: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 2:06COLBrandon Yip: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P2 5:43BUFTim Connolly: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 14:47COLDaniel Winnik: Holding2 min
  9. P2 15:41BUFDrew Stafford: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P3 9:39COLRyan O'Byrne: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 13:11COLAdam Foote: Interference2 min
  12. OT 0:47COLMilan Hejduk: Tripping2 min
  13. OT 2:32BUFTyler Ennis: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gaustad won the faceoff against Galiardi
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCOL
40Shots on goal34
4.2Expected goals3.2
57Shot attempts61
37Faceoffs won31
8Power plays6
12Penalty minutes16
14Hits15
15Blocked shots10
6Giveaways10
8Takeaways17

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestHecht – Stafford – Ennis6:21

    xG 0.18–0.03 (88%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Niedermayer – Grier – Gaustad6:14

    xG 0.51–0.41 (56%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

  3. Connolly – Pominville – Vanek9:29

    xG 0.39–0.38 (51%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

  4. Niedermayer – Hecht – Stafford2:04

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Montador11:16

    xG 0.63–0.27 (70%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Morrisonn – Weber11:09

    xG 0.59–0.56 (51%)attempts 9–14goals 0–1

  3. Sekera – Myers9:06

    xG 0.14–0.23 (38%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestJones – Winnik – Galiardi3:12

    xG 0.30–0.14 (68%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Hejduk – Fleischmann – Duchene10:11

    xG 0.39–0.43 (47%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  3. Porter – Winnik – O'Reilly2:23

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–1

  4. Jones – Winnik – O'Reilly2:29

    xG 0.00–0.21 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Byrne – Hunwick2:16

    xG 0.19–0.05 (79%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  2. Foote – Hunwick2:12

    xG 0.15–0.11 (59%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Liles – Shattenkirk4:48

    xG 0.03–0.04 (45%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.2 xGBUF 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #79 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.53 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 65% of the time.

COL winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).