Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 8, 2011·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Los Angeles Kings 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 69% of the time.

LAK winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ09112313434
LAK311111214636

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:13LAKDustin BrownAssists: Anze Kopitar, Drew Doughty · Snap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:24LAKMarco SturmPPAssists: Alec Martinez, Jack Johnson · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:50LAKJarret StollAssists: Drew Doughty, Ryan Smyth · Tip-in, 0.05 xG0–3
  4. P2 7:12LAKJarret StollSHAssists: Marco Sturm, Jack Johnson · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–4
  5. P2 13:30CBJMatt CalvertUnassisted · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P3 6:47CBJRick NashAssists: Jakub Voracek, Anton Stralman · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–4
  7. P3 10:58CBJFedor TyutinAssists: Antoine Vermette, R.J. Umberger · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–4
  8. P3 16:29LAKRyan SmythGWGAssists: Justin Williams, Michal Handzus · Tip-in, 0.21 xG3–5
  9. P3 17:27CBJRick NashAssists: Jakub Voracek, Kris Russell · Wrist, 0.52 xG4–5
  10. P3 19:29LAKJustin WilliamsENAssists: Jack Johnson, Michal Handzus · Wrist, 0.67 xG4–6
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 7:37CBJAntoine Vermette: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:02CBJDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 11:02LAKKyle Clifford: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:27CBJFedor Tyutin: Interference2 min
  5. P1 16:27LAKWayne Simmonds: Cross checking2 min
  6. P1 18:49LAKJarret Stoll: Holding2 min
  7. P2 2:58CBJKyle Wilson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P2 5:45LAKKyle Clifford: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 10:04LAKMichal Handzus: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  10. P3 0:37CBJRick Nash: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 10:00LAKAnze Kopitar: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 10:00CBJJared Boll: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 18:24CBJKyle Wilson: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Handzus won the faceoff against Vermette
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJLAK
34Shots on goal36
3.0Expected goals4.3
60Shot attempts68
33Faceoffs won31
3Power plays4
17Penalty minutes15
32Hits26
12Blocked shots10
7Giveaways14
1Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestNash – Brassard – Voracek11:10

    xG 0.89–0.44 (67%)attempts 11–11goals 2–0

  2. Huselius – Vermette – Umberger6:14

    xG 0.18–0.03 (85%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  3. Clark – Pahlsson – Dorsett6:39

    xG 0.45–0.63 (42%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  4. Wilson – Boll – Calvert6:35

    xG 0.12–0.45 (21%)attempts 4–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Tyutin – Stralman13:33

    xG 0.34–0.53 (39%)attempts 12–15goals 1–0

  2. Klesla – Russell11:15

    xG 0.55–0.85 (39%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  3. Hejda – Methot13:43

    xG 0.27–0.82 (25%)attempts 10–18goals 1–3

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestPonikarovsky – Brown – Kopitar10:58

    xG 0.59–0.28 (68%)attempts 14–9goals 1–2

  2. Smyth – Handzus – Williams9:16

    xG 0.52–0.26 (66%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

  3. Lewis – Westgarth – Clifford2:36

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Sturm – Stoll – Simmonds9:26

    xG 0.11–0.71 (14%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestScuderi – Doughty12:19

    xG 0.71–0.39 (65%)attempts 13–15goals 2–0

  2. Greene – Martinez11:27

    xG 0.25–0.39 (39%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Mitchell – Johnson11:37

    xG 0.55–0.89 (38%)attempts 13–15goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 4.3 xGCBJ 3.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #95 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.08 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 69% of the time.

LAK winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).