Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 9, 2011·RBC Center, Raleigh

Atlanta Thrashers 3, Carolina Hurricanes 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 71% of the time.

CAR winsATL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ATL181121800328
CAR1921001213434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:20CARTuomo RuutuPPAssists: Joe Corvo · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:46ATLBryan LittlePPAssists: Nik Antropov, Toby Enstrom · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:57CARZac DalpeAssists: Patrick Dwyer, Tuomo Ruutu · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:33CARJeff SkinnerPPAssists: Joe Corvo, Jamie McBain · Slap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 7:57ATLNiclas BergforsPPAssists: Andrew Ladd, Toby Enstrom · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 10:42ATLBryan LittleAssists: Anthony Stewart, Johnny Oduya · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:09CARErik ColeGWGAssists: Ian White, Eric Staal · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:55ATLChris Thorburn: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:16CARTuomo Ruutu: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 16:59ATLBrent Sopel: Holding the stick2 min
  4. P2 5:05ATLBryan Little: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 6:59CARErik Cole: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 15:25CARErik Cole: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 19:06ATLToby Enstrom: Holding2 min
  8. P3 17:09CARChad LaRose: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ATL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
47% to win53% to win
← ATL attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Peverley
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ATLCAR
28Shots on goal34
1.7Expected goals2.9
55Shot attempts58
26Faceoffs won37
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
30Hits46
12Blocked shots15
8Giveaways8
1Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Atlanta Thrashers

Forward lines

  1. bestLadd – Peverley – Bergfors9:57

    xG 0.39–0.22 (64%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  2. Boulton – Antropov – Stapleton9:41

    xG 0.36–0.31 (54%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  3. Thorburn – Stewart – Little9:48

    xG 0.40–0.40 (50%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  4. Machacek – Cormier – Burmistrov7:31

    xG 0.06–0.44 (11%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEnstrom – Byfuglien16:34

    xG 0.64–0.43 (60%)attempts 17–14goals 0–0

  2. Oduya – Bogosian13:35

    xG 0.25–0.24 (51%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  3. Sopel – Hainsey8:19

    xG 0.23–0.82 (22%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestRuutu – LaRose – Skinner11:15

    xG 0.54–0.18 (74%)attempts 17–6goals 0–0

  2. Dwyer – Sutter – Dalpe12:00

    xG 0.53–0.28 (66%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Staal – Boychuk13:32

    xG 0.74–0.63 (54%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

  4. Samsonov – Bodie – Matsumoto3:58

    xG 0.13–0.03 (80%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPitkanen – White3:24

    xG 0.28–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Pitkanen – McBain13:09

    xG 0.54–0.33 (62%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1

  3. Corvo – Gleason17:57

    xG 0.69–0.52 (57%)attempts 16–14goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 2.9 xGATL 1.7 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARATL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it ATL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #159 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.12 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 41% (winner's lowest chance)
ATL 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 71% of the time.

CAR winsATL wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − ATL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).