Tue, Jan 18, 2011·Scotiabank Place, Ottawa
Anaheim Ducks 2, Ottawa Senators 1 (SO)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 76% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | SO | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA | 110 | 03 | 012 | 02 | 1 | 227 |
| OTT | 015 | 113 | 011 | 01 | 0 | 140 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 14:30ANACorey PerryAssists: Bobby Ryan, Matt Beleskey · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–0
- P2 18:19OTTMike FisherAssists: Milan Michalek, Erik Karlsson · Backhand, 0.17 xG1–1
Shootout
- 1. OTT Daniel Alfredsson stopped
- 2. ANA Corey Perry stopped
- 3. OTT Mike Fisher stopped
- 4. ANA Bobby Ryan scored
- 5. OTT Erik Karlsson stopped
Penalties (4)
- P1 5:49ANAPaul Mara: Holding2 min
- P1 12:33OTTMatt Carkner: Fighting5 min
- P1 12:33ANAGeorge Parros: Fighting5 min
- P1 14:52ANAJason Blake: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Fisher
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestSelanne – Koivu – Blake15:33
xG 0.59–0.39 (60%)attempts 16–14goals 0–0
- Perry – Ryan – Beleskey12:37
xG 0.67–0.47 (59%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0
- Marchant – McMillan – Sexton4:30
xG 0.21–0.28 (44%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
- Lupul – Lapierre – McMillan7:17
xG 0.02–0.48 (3%)attempts 1–11goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestSbisa – Fowler6:07
xG 0.30–0.17 (63%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0
- Visnovsky – Fowler3:35
xG 0.23–0.10 (68%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Mara – Sutton2:18
xG 0.29–0.35 (46%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
Ottawa Senators
Forward lines
- bestRuutu – Kelly – Shannon2:54
xG 0.64–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
- Alfredsson – Fisher – Michalek2:09
xG 0.40–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0
- Neil – Shannon – Winchester2:20
xG 0.24–0.09 (73%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0
- Alfredsson – Kelly – Michalek13:18
xG 0.61–0.51 (55%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGonchar – Campoli14:00
xG 0.71–0.16 (82%)attempts 20–10goals 0–0
- Gonchar – Lee2:58
xG 0.39–0.02 (96%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0
- Gonchar – Karlsson2:24
xG 0.55–0.32 (63%)attempts 5–4goals 1–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 76% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (OTT − ANA), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).