Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 22, 2011·Centre Bell, Montreal

Anaheim Ducks 4, Montréal Canadiens 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 83% of the time.

MTL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA1821105021426
MTL07110223000340

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:07ANACam FowlerPPAssists: Lubomir Visnovsky, Teemu Selanne · Slap, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:55MTLMax PaciorettyPPAssists: Scott Gomez · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 16:26ANABobby RyanAssists: Joffrey Lupul · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P2 19:43ANACorey PerryPPAssists: Saku Koivu, Teemu Selanne · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P3 16:20MTLMathieu DarcheAssists: Yannick Weber, Andrei Kostitsyn · Tip-in, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:47MTLMax PaciorettyPPAssists: Tomas Plekanec, P.K. Subban · Backhand, 0.27 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. MTL Benoit Pouliot stopped
  2. 2. ANA Corey Perry stopped
  3. 3. MTL Andrei Kostitsyn stopped
  4. 4. ANA Bobby Ryan scored
  5. 5. MTL Brian Gionta stopped
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 11:02MTLP.K. Subban: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 13:45MTLMax Pacioretty: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 0:52ANASaku Koivu: Interference2 min
  4. P2 6:45ANASaku Koivu: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 13:42ANATodd Marchant: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 18:30MTLTomas Plekanec: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 0:43ANABrandon McMillan: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 3:28MTLBenoit Pouliot: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 13:48ANAJason Blake: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 18:45ANASaku Koivu: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gomez won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAMTL
26Shots on goal40
1.7Expected goals3.8
43Shot attempts77
34Faceoffs won28
4Power plays6
12Penalty minutes8
27Hits16
26Blocked shots9
8Giveaways7
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestPerry – Ryan – McMillan9:36

    xG 0.26–0.19 (58%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  2. Marchant – Parros – Sexton4:47

    xG 0.12–0.06 (68%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Lupul – Lapierre – Beleskey8:05

    xG 0.02–0.11 (17%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  4. Selanne – Koivu – Blake10:06

    xG 0.19–0.54 (26%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVisnovsky – Fowler5:36

    xG 0.38–0.11 (78%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  2. Lilja – Fowler11:03

    xG 0.17–0.20 (46%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  3. Lydman – Lilja2:30

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestGomez – Gionta – Pacioretty11:53

    xG 0.47–0.16 (74%)attempts 13–3goals 0–0

  2. Moen – Plekanec – Kostitsyn3:58

    xG 0.28–0.03 (91%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  3. Darche – Pouliot – Desharnais8:22

    xG 0.16–0.07 (70%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Moen – White – Engqvist3:52

    xG 0.04–0.10 (27%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamrlik – Wisniewski15:33

    xG 0.64–0.23 (74%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Spacek – Weber10:38

    xG 0.25–0.13 (66%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Gill – Subban10:43

    xG 0.19–0.24 (45%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 3.8 xGANA 1.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #123 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.25 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 83% of the time.

MTL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).