Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 24, 2011·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Nashville Predators 1, Calgary Flames 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 55% of the time.

CGY winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH0617011124
CGY1811415327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:14CGYCurtis GlencrossAssists: Matt Stajan, Niklas Hagman · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 10:32NSHDavid LegwandAssists: Colin Wilson, Joel Ward · Wrist, 0.47 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:01CGYJarome IginlaPPGWGAssists: Matt Stajan, Alex Tanguay · Wrist, 0.36 xG1–2
  4. P3 14:18CGYBrendan MorrisonPPAssists: Alex Tanguay, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:33NSHRyan Suter: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 7:49NSHMatt Halischuk: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 11:57CGYMark Giordano: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 17:44CGYMark Giordano: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 5:03NSHDavid Legwand: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 10:50CGYCory Sarich: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 12:44NSHJoel Ward: High sticking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 14:20NSHPatric Hornqvist: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P2 18:44CGYJay Bouwmeester: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 7:55CGYCory Sarich: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 13:31NSHJerred Smithson: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← NSH attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Goc won the faceoff against Jokinen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHCGY
24Shots on goal27
2.1Expected goals2.5
45Shot attempts57
28Faceoffs won25
5Power plays6
12Penalty minutes10
12Hits9
15Blocked shots12
6Giveaways11
8Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestSmithson – Ward – Spaling4:44

    xG 0.18–0.05 (78%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Erat – Goc – Kostitsyn5:57

    xG 0.32–0.24 (57%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Legwand – Hornqvist – Wilson4:15

    xG 0.22–0.18 (54%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Belak – Halischuk – Mueller2:01

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Brien – Franson7:48

    xG 0.85–0.03 (97%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  2. Suter – Weber14:43

    xG 0.79–0.64 (55%)attempts 15–15goals 0–1

  3. Klein – O'Brien2:01

    xG 0.03–0.03 (48%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestIginla – Kostopoulos – Backlund2:25

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Kostopoulos – Jackman – Backlund2:32

    xG 0.15–0.06 (73%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Morrison – Iginla – Tanguay7:41

    xG 0.13–0.07 (64%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Jokinen – Moss – Bourque7:42

    xG 0.32–0.42 (43%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSarich – Pardy4:27

    xG 0.29–0.03 (92%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Giordano – Pardy3:21

    xG 0.27–0.15 (64%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Bouwmeester – Giordano2:15

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.5 xGNSH 2.1 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 37/100 · #732 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.29 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 55% of the time.

CGY winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).