
- Age
- 42
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 185 cm
- Weight
- 88 kg
- Born
- Mississauga, CAN
- Draft
- 2002, round 2, #57 (TOR)
Career · 2009–10 to 2017–18
- Games
- 613
- Goals
- 75
- Points
- 231
- TOI per game
- 14:23
- xGF% (5v5)
- 51.1%
- Goals above expected
- −5.2
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2009–10 | 55 | 16 | 25 | 41 | −3 | 18:47 | 99 | 16.2% | 13 | 13.8 | – | |
| 2009–10 | 27 | 3 | 13 | 16 | −3 | 19:11 | 33 | 9.1% | 2 | 5.0 | – | |
| 2009–10 | All teams | 82 | 19 | 38 | 57 | −6 | 18:55 | 132 | 14.4% | 15 | 18.8 | – |
| 2010–11 | 76 | 6 | 25 | 31 | +1 | 14:14 | 81 | 7.4% | 1 | 11.5 | 54.0% | |
| 2011–12 | 61 | 8 | 10 | 18 | −3 | 13:01 | 77 | 10.4% | 2 | 9.3 | 52.8% | |
| 2012–13 | 43 | 5 | 18 | 23 | +7 | 17:10 | 44 | 11.4% | 0 | 6.6 | 52.4% | |
| 2013–14 | 63 | 14 | 19 | 33 | −13 | 18:22 | 70 | 20.0% | 1 | 8.6 | 49.3% | |
| 2014–15 | 59 | 7 | 10 | 17 | +7 | 12:00 | 46 | 15.2% | 0 | 5.3 | 49.8% | |
| 2015–16 | 80 | 6 | 11 | 17 | −4 | 12:42 | 58 | 10.3% | 0 | 5.6 | 45.1% | |
| 2016–17 | 81 | 6 | 17 | 23 | +3 | 12:41 | 59 | 10.2% | 0 | 6.6 | 49.5% | |
| 2017–18 | 68 | 4 | 8 | 12 | +4 | 10:56 | 65 | 6.2% | 0 | 7.9 | 57.1% | |
| Total | 2 teams | 613 | 75 | 156 | 231 | −4 | 14:23 | 632 | 11.9% | 19 | 80.2 | 51.1% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2017–18 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
3rd line
42nd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
4th line- Goals /600.5131st pct
- Assists /601.0667th pct
- ixG /600.5525th pct
- Goals above expected−5.224th pct
Play-driving
3rd line- xGF% (5v5)51.1%70th pct
- CF% (5v5)48.5%43rd pct
- Relative xGF%+1.976th pct
- Penalty diff /60-0.1227th pct
Usage
3rd line- TOI per game14:2358th pct
- PP time share6.1%32nd pct
- Offensive zone starts37.4%11th pct
- Quality of competition23.9%47th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Stajan wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2017–18, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1739+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
49.8%
3646–3670 · #106 of 187 regulars, 44th percentile
Against an average centre
50.2%
Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.
Wins above average
+11
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
12.0
7,316 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone50.3% 878–866
- Neutral zone51.1% 1324–1268
- Defensive zone48.5% 1444–1536
By strength
- Even strength50.4% 2978–2929
- Power play48.1% 193–208
- Shorthanded46.5% 452–521
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +9 after a win, −16 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.1 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Henrik Sedin51.2% 65–62
- Mikko Koivu47.1% 57–64
- Antoine Vermette36.4% 40–70
- Paul Stastny44.0% 48–61
- Anze Kopitar51.9% 56–52
- Jonathan Toews37.1% 36–61
- Kyle Brodziak59.6% 56–38
- Mike Fisher39.1% 36–56
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 1326 | 51.8% | 52.3% |
| 2010–11 | 845 | 51.6% | 52.3% |
| 2011–12 | 639 | 51.8% | 52.3% |
| 2012–13 | 770 | 46.2% | 46.8% |
| 2013–14 | 1096 | 48.1% | 48.3% |
| 2014–15 | 602 | 50.3% | 50.4% |
| 2015–16 | 788 | 47.3% | 47.1% |
| 2016–17 | 768 | 50.1% | 50.3% |
| 2017–18 | 482 | 51.5% | 51.6% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−5.2 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games