Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 6, 2011·St. Pete Times Forum, Tampa

St. Louis Blues 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 65% of the time.

TBL winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
STL093160601332
TBL1132120619440

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:43TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Brett Clark, Martin St. Louis · Wrist, 0.27 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:30STLPatrik BerglundAssists: Alexander Steen, T.J. Oshie · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:33TBLDominic MooreAssists: Steven Stamkos, Marc-Andre Bergeron · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:05STLDavid BackesPPAssists: Alexander Steen, Matt D'Agostini · Tip-in, 0.19 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:09STLNikita NikitinAssists: Jay McClement · Slap, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 13:39TBLSteve DownieAssists: Steven Stamkos, Martin St. Louis · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:53TBLVincent LecavalierPPGWGAssists: Marc-Andre Bergeron, Steven Stamkos · Backhand, 0.31 xG3–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 5:05TBLSimon Gagne: Holding2 min
  2. P1 7:18TBLAdam Hall: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 9:52STLB.J. Crombeen: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 11:16STLDavid Backes: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 10:10TBLVictor Hedman: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 10:24TBLMattias Ohlund: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P3 0:11STLAndy McDonald: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 10:39STLVladimir Sobotka: Hooking2 min
  9. OT 3:40STLEric Brewer: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← STL attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Backes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLTBL
32Shots on goal40
2.7Expected goals3.5
65Shot attempts65
33Faceoffs won25
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
19Hits29
12Blocked shots16
4Giveaways12
5Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSteen – Oshie – Berglund6:14

    xG 0.46–0.11 (81%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

  2. McDonald – Boyes – Backes10:57

    xG 0.36–0.32 (52%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  3. McClement – Sobotka – D'Agostini8:53

    xG 0.23–0.25 (47%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  4. McDonald – Oshie – Berglund2:02

    xG 0.00–0.21 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNikitin – Johnson3:15

    xG 0.08–0.01 (89%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Nikitin – Polak6:48

    xG 0.20–0.14 (59%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  3. Brewer – Johnson12:05

    xG 0.77–0.75 (50%)attempts 14–14goals 1–3

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestSt. Louis – Downie – Stamkos13:39

    xG 1.03–0.25 (81%)attempts 16–8goals 2–1

  2. Lecavalier – Moore – Bergenheim2:00

    xG 0.09–0.10 (47%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Lecavalier – Gagne – Purcell9:05

    xG 0.20–0.31 (39%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  4. Hall – Thompson – Tyrell9:45

    xG 0.18–0.46 (28%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestClark – Smaby3:05

    xG 0.38–0.02 (95%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Clark – Kubina2:06

    xG 0.39–0.05 (88%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  3. Bergeron – Jones2:17

    xG 0.14–0.06 (69%)attempts 3–2goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.5 xGSTL 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #175 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.22 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 24% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 65% of the time.

TBL winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).