Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 11, 2011·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Anaheim Ducks 5, Calgary Flames 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 62% of the time.

CGY winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ANA152141714530
CGY09272801425

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:04ANASaku KoivuAssists: Jason Blake, Teemu Selanne · Snap, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:16CGYRene BourqueAssists: Robyn Regehr, Jarome Iginla · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:57CGYOlli JokinenAssists: Curtis Glencross, David Moss · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:34ANASaku KoivuAssists: Teemu Selanne, Jason Blake · Wrist, 0.26 xG2–2
  5. P2 10:12ANABrandon McMillanSHAssists: Corey Perry, Andy Sutton · Snap, 0.09 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:33CGYJarome IginlaAssists: Robyn Regehr, Brendan Morrison · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. P3 8:18CGYCurtis GlencrossAssists: David Moss, Olli Jokinen · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:53ANATeemu SelannePPAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Corey Perry · Snap, 0.36 xG4–4
  9. OT 4:41ANACam FowlerGWGAssists: Saku Koivu, Teemu Selanne · Backhand, 0.06 xG5–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 9:52ANAGeorge Parros: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:20ANALuca Sbisa: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  3. P2 8:49ANAGeorge Parros: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P3 12:40ANAAndy Sutton: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 17:42CGYCurtis Glencross: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Morrison won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACGY
30Shots on goal25
2.1Expected goals2.8
52Shot attempts70
25Faceoffs won23
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
13Hits20
26Blocked shots15
5Giveaways12
14Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSelanne – Koivu – Blake14:20

    xG 0.86–0.42 (67%)attempts 23–15goals 2–0

  2. Marchant – Parros – Ryan3:05

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  3. Lapierre – McMillan – Sexton9:54

    xG 0.15–0.27 (35%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

  4. Getzlaf – Perry – Ryan17:09

    xG 0.29–0.49 (37%)attempts 7–16goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestSutton – Sbisa6:45

    xG 0.45–0.06 (88%)attempts 8–4goals 2–0

  2. Lydman – Visnovsky17:55

    xG 0.61–0.41 (60%)attempts 15–21goals 0–1

  3. Sutton – Beauchemin3:14

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestKostopoulos – Jackman – Stajan2:45

    xG 0.19–0.00 (99%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Jokinen – Moss – Glencross12:30

    xG 0.26–0.16 (61%)attempts 12–5goals 2–0

  3. Hagman – Jackman – Stajan7:59

    xG 0.14–0.13 (51%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Morrison – Iginla – Bourque13:06

    xG 0.40–0.45 (47%)attempts 12–13goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRegehr – Bouwmeester19:09

    xG 0.70–0.57 (55%)attempts 21–13goals 2–1

  2. Bouwmeester – Giordano3:28

    xG 0.10–0.01 (94%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  3. Staios – Babchuk10:51

    xG 0.21–0.15 (58%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.8 xGANA 2.1 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #28 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.96 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 62% of the time.

CGY winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).