Skip to content
Ice Lab

Left wing · #22

Curtis Glencross

Calgary Flames Washington Capitals(traded during the season)
Age
43
Shoots
Left
Height
185 cm
Weight
89 kg
Born
Kindersley, CAN
Draft
Undrafted

Career · 2009–10 to 2014–15

Games
362
Goals
105
Points
209
TOI per game
16:43
xGF% (5v5)
49.1%
Goals above expected
+26.3

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10CGY67151833+1115:4311712.8%411.6–
2010–11CGY79241943+616:1514916.1%518.855.3%
2011–12CGY67262248−1318:0111023.6%1313.246.0%
2012–13CGY40151126−818:149216.3%611.248.7%
2013–14CGY38121224−1117:377715.6%810.846.9%
2014–15CGY5391928+316:418710.3%810.446.1%
2014–15WSH18437−112:362119.0%32.752.7%
2014–15All teams71132235+215:3910812.0%1113.147.5%
Total2 teams362105104209−1316:4365316.1%4778.749.1%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.5150100150200250300350
12m14m16m18m20m22m50100150200250300350Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd line

69th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

1st line
  • Goals /601.0489th pct
  • Assists /601.0364th pct
  • ixG /600.7865th pct
  • Goals above expected+26.398th pct

Play-driving

4th line
  • xGF% (5v5)49.1%48th pct
  • CF% (5v5)47.7%34th pct
  • Relative xGF%−1.542nd pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.1128th pct

Usage

2nd line
  • TOI per game16:4378th pct
  • PP time share34.7%68th pct
  • Offensive zone starts51.3%35th pct
  • Quality of competition24.9%81st pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Glencross wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2014–15, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1134+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

42.3%

149–203 · below the 1134 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

43.5%

Opponents won 51.2% of their draws; an average centre would have won 48.8% against them.

Wins above average

−23

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

2.2

352 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

54%28 · +1.249%69 · +0.840%63 · +1.344%16 · −0.418%11 · +5.353%19 · +0.438%13 · +7.448%81 · −0.623%52 · −0.5Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone45.4% 59–71
  • Neutral zone44.8% 39–48
  • Defensive zone37.8% 51–84

By strength

  • Even strength45.3% 78–94
  • Power play41.7% 30–42
  • Shorthanded38.7% 41–65

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +9 after a win, −12 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.6 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–102437.5%39.5%
2010–1114140.4%41.1%
2011–128250.0%52.1%
2012–134643.5%45.9%
2013–144134.1%33.5%
2014–151844.4%44.9%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+26.3 goals above expected

02040608010012050100150200250300350Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−40−200+20+40+60+80+100+120