Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 16, 2011·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Los Angeles Kings 4, Columbus Blue Jackets 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 70% of the time.

CBJ winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
LAK11011017021429
CBJ171619020324

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:52LAKJustin WilliamsAssists: Andrei Loktionov, Alec Martinez · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:34CBJJakub VoracekAssists: Derek MacKenzie, Rick Nash · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:05LAKAndrei LoktionovAssists: Matt Greene · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:14CBJRick NashAssists: Derek MacKenzie, Grant Clitsome · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:08LAKDrew DoughtyAssists: Michal Handzus, Anze Kopitar · Slap, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:37CBJKris RussellAssists: Jakub Voracek, Rick Nash · Backhand, 0.21 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. CBJ Rick Nash stopped
  2. 2. LAK Michal Handzus stopped
  3. 3. CBJ Matt Calvert stopped
  4. 4. LAK Jarret Stoll scored
  5. 5. CBJ Kristian Huselius stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 14:46CBJGrant Clitsome: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 4:55CBJChris Clark: Elbowing2 min
  3. P2 18:24LAKDrew Doughty: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 18:31LAKTrevor Lewis: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 12:28CBJKris Russell: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win53% to win
← LAK attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against Pahlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKCBJ
29Shots on goal24
1.8Expected goals2.9
49Shot attempts56
29Faceoffs won36
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
21Hits47
12Blocked shots10
2Giveaways1
1Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestSmyth – Williams – Stoll11:05

    xG 0.58–0.34 (63%)attempts 12–8goals 0–2

  2. Handzus – Kopitar – Simmonds12:35

    xG 0.23–0.19 (54%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

  3. Brown – Loktionov – Clifford10:10

    xG 0.24–0.22 (52%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  4. Ponikarovsky – Lewis – Westgarth4:17

    xG 0.18–0.17 (51%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMitchell – Doughty19:29

    xG 0.49–0.35 (58%)attempts 17–14goals 1–1

  2. Greene – Martinez9:38

    xG 0.33–0.32 (51%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  3. Scuderi – Johnson16:01

    xG 0.41–0.59 (41%)attempts 9–17goals 0–1

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestClark – Pahlsson – Murray10:33

    xG 0.29–0.17 (63%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

  2. MacKenzie – Nash – Voracek8:09

    xG 0.44–0.40 (52%)attempts 9–8goals 2–0

  3. Umberger – Nash – Voracek3:37

    xG 0.04–0.07 (36%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Huselius – Vermette – Calvert3:48

    xG 0.07–0.18 (27%)attempts 2–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Clitsome – Russell12:47

    xG 0.40–0.38 (51%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

  2. Hejda – Stralman17:51

    xG 0.39–0.46 (46%)attempts 12–14goals 0–1

  3. Tyutin – Methot14:01

    xG 0.13–0.33 (28%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.9 xGLAK 1.8 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #94 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.53 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 70% of the time.

CBJ winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).