Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 18, 2011·United Center, Chicago

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Chicago Blackhawks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 71% of the time.

CHI winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ11231707436
CHI213117010340

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:22CBJMatt CalvertUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:32CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:04CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:38CBJAntoine VermettePPAssists: Rick Nash, Grant Clitsome · Slap, 0.42 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:28CBJDerek MacKenzieAssists: Matt Calvert, R.J. Umberger · Backhand, 0.32 xG3–2
  6. P2 15:32CBJAnton StralmanPPGWGAssists: Kristian Huselius, R.J. Umberger · Slap, 0.04 xG4–2
  7. P2 15:53CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Jonathan Toews, Patrick Sharp · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 19:01CHIJake Dowell: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 2:52CBJJared Boll: Elbowing2 min
  3. P2 3:24CHITomas Kopecky: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P2 9:08CHIViktor Stalberg: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 14:25CHINick Leddy: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P3 4:23CBJMatt Calvert: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 17:32CBJAnton Stralman: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopecky won the faceoff against Pahlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJCHI
36Shots on goal40
4.0Expected goals2.8
51Shot attempts64
29Faceoffs won38
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
43Hits18
15Blocked shots10
4Giveaways3
3Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestMoreau – MacKenzie – Boll4:56

    xG 0.35–0.12 (75%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Vermette – Nash – Voracek11:10

    xG 0.65–0.65 (50%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  3. Clark – Pahlsson – Murray12:39

    xG 0.37–0.41 (47%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

  4. Huselius – Umberger – Calvert6:42

    xG 0.19–0.48 (29%)attempts 4–8goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestHejda – Stralman18:11

    xG 1.18–1.00 (54%)attempts 18–23goals 1–1

  2. Russell – Moore8:23

    xG 0.25–0.39 (39%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Tyutin – Clitsome16:40

    xG 0.46–0.85 (35%)attempts 10–18goals 0–2

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Bolland – Frolik10:03

    xG 0.94–0.36 (72%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  2. Sharp – Toews – Kane15:20

    xG 1.08–0.66 (62%)attempts 24–11goals 3–1

  3. Hossa – Bolland – Brouwer3:43

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  4. Kopecky – Bickell – Brouwer7:45

    xG 0.02–0.66 (4%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Leddy15:18

    xG 0.92–0.44 (68%)attempts 21–10goals 2–1

  2. Seabrook – Hjalmarsson11:51

    xG 0.78–0.42 (65%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  3. Campbell – Keith3:22

    xG 0.25–0.14 (63%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.8 xGCBJ 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHICBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #450 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.71 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 71% of the time.

CHI winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).