Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 26, 2011·Air Canada Centre, Toronto

Pittsburgh Penguins 6, Toronto Maple Leafs 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 56% of the time.

TOR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT111212211061640
TOR11118311010531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:43TORJoffrey LupulPPAssists: Dion Phaneuf, Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.53 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:13PITAlex KovalevAssists: Ben Lovejoy · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:31TORColby ArmstrongAssists: Mike Brown · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:00PITMark LetestuPPAssists: Kris Letang, Jordan Staal · Snap, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:44PITDustin JeffreyAssists: Pascal Dupuis, Matt Cooke · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:52TORClarke MacArthurAssists: Mikhail Grabovski, Nikolay Kulemin · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. P3 3:27TORJoffrey LupulAssists: Carl Gunnarsson · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–4
  8. P3 6:34PITMax TalbotSHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.23 xG4–4
  9. P3 7:27TORDion PhaneufPPAssists: Tim Brent, Phil Kessel · Slap, 0.03 xG4–5
  10. P3 9:08PITMike RuppAssists: Mark Letestu · Wrist, 0.12 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. TOR Joffrey Lupul stopped
  2. 2. PIT Kris Letang stopped
  3. 3. TOR Phil Kessel stopped
  4. 4. PIT Alex Kovalev scored
  5. 5. TOR Mikhail Grabovski stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 7:50PITAlex Kovalev: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 11:15TORJay Rosehill: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 16:02PITJames Neal: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 3:28TORJay Rosehill: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 3:28PITMike Rupp: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 6:56PITPascal Dupuis: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 11:34PITJoe Vitale: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 15:32TORTyler Bozak: Slashing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 6:12PITMark Letestu: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  10. P3 15:09PITAlex Kovalev: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 15:09TORColby Armstrong: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 16:55PITZbynek Michalek: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Grabovski won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTOR
40Shots on goal31
3.4Expected goals3.0
68Shot attempts56
31Faceoffs won36
2Power plays6
19Penalty minutes11
24Hits35
14Blocked shots17
12Giveaways18
12Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCooke – Dupuis – Jeffrey6:05

    xG 0.52–0.05 (90%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

  2. Adams – Rupp – Vitale3:40

    xG 0.22–0.04 (85%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Talbot – Conner – Letestu5:10

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  4. Kovalev – Neal – Staal11:28

    xG 0.64–0.58 (52%)attempts 15–13goals 1–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestEngelland – Letang12:33

    xG 1.38–0.60 (70%)attempts 22–10goals 1–1

  2. Niskanen – Lovejoy11:19

    xG 0.51–0.05 (92%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  3. Michalek – Strait9:06

    xG 0.34–0.26 (57%)attempts 12–6goals 0–1

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestSjostrom – Brent – Rosehill3:46

    xG 0.21–0.10 (67%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Armstrong – Boyce – Brown12:43

    xG 0.27–0.33 (45%)attempts 9–8goals 1–1

  3. Lupul – Kessel – Bozak8:48

    xG 0.24–0.41 (36%)attempts 6–15goals 1–2

  4. MacArthur – Grabovski – Kulemin13:23

    xG 0.65–0.97 (40%)attempts 16–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Gunnarsson – Schenn15:23

    xG 0.43–0.68 (39%)attempts 14–20goals 0–1

  2. Phaneuf – Aulie15:46

    xG 0.76–1.05 (42%)attempts 10–21goals 2–2

  3. Komisarek – Lebda9:53

    xG 0.12–0.47 (21%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 3.0 xGPIT 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #14 of 1230 this seasonSwing 3.51 · 10 goals in reachComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 56% of the time.

TOR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).