Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 5, 2011·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Buffalo Sabres 5, Philadelphia Flyers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 79% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF09313213535
PHI210113013336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:44PHIKris VersteegPPAssists: Matt Carle, Mike Richards · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:22PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Claude Giroux · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:52BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Thomas Vanek, Tyler Ennis · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:48BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Paul Gaustad, Andrej Sekera · Snap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P2 10:32BUFAndrej SekeraAssists: Brad Boyes, Jason Pominville · Backhand, 0.26 xG3–2
  6. P2 13:23PHIKimmo TimonenSHAssists: Braydon Coburn · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:37BUFJason PominvilleGWGAssists: Thomas Vanek, Brad Boyes · Tip-in, 0.17 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:56BUFNathan GerbeENAssists: Paul Gaustad, Patrick Kaleta · Wrist, 0.69 xG5–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 5:58BUFCody McCormick: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 7:16PHIMatt Carle: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 8:06PHIDarroll Powe: Interference2 min
  4. P1 10:57BUFShaone Morrisonn: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:03BUFJordan Leopold: Interference2 min
  6. P2 4:49PHIChris Pronger: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 11:23PHIScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 11:23BUFPatrick Kaleta: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 12:05PHIKris Versteeg: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 8:14BUFRyan Miller: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackPHI attack →
  1. Press play, or drag along the timeline.
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPHI
35Shots on goal36
4.0Expected goals2.2
57Shot attempts83
26Faceoffs won38
4Power plays4
10Penalty minutes10
16Hits31
29Blocked shots15
7Giveaways6
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyes – Pominville – Vanek6:34

    xG 0.83–0.16 (84%)attempts 8–8goals 2–0

  2. Gaustad – Kaleta – Gerbe6:03

    xG 0.23–0.15 (60%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  3. Gaustad – Pominville – Vanek3:06

    xG 0.05–0.03 (69%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Connolly – Boyes – Ennis2:50

    xG 0.11–0.10 (54%)attempts 1–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMontador – Sekera15:33

    xG 1.17–0.59 (67%)attempts 17–19goals 1–0

  2. Butler – Myers13:05

    xG 0.46–0.38 (55%)attempts 9–18goals 1–0

  3. Leopold – Morrisonn12:28

    xG 0.31–0.26 (55%)attempts 9–14goals 1–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestBrière – Hartnell – Leino9:18

    xG 0.42–0.31 (58%)attempts 14–7goals 0–2

  2. Betts – Nodl – Powe3:15

    xG 0.05–0.08 (38%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Zherdev – Richards – Versteeg7:51

    xG 0.13–0.25 (33%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Carter – Giroux – van Riemsdyk8:22

    xG 0.21–0.77 (21%)attempts 9–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. O'Donnell – Meszaros10:33

    xG 0.34–0.36 (48%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

  2. Pronger – Carle14:25

    xG 0.42–0.45 (48%)attempts 17–9goals 1–1

  3. Timonen – Coburn11:28

    xG 0.11–0.75 (13%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.2 xGBUF 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #166 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.96 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 79% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).