Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 9, 2011·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Calgary Flames 4, Dallas Stars 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 67% of the time.

DAL winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CGY31004013072434
DAL1811519021334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:26CGYRene BourqueAssists: Curtis Glencross, Steve Staios · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:28CGYTom KostopoulosAssists: Tim Jackman, Mikael Backlund · Wrist, 0.27 xG2–0
  3. P1 13:41CGYAnton BabchukUnassisted · Slap, 0.02 xG3–0
  4. P1 18:28DALJamie BennPPAssists: Steve Ott, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.39 xG3–1
  5. P2 5:12DALMike RibeiroAssists: Jeff Woywitka · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:39DALTomas VincourAssists: Toby Petersen, Jeff Woywitka · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. DAL Jamie Benn stopped
  2. 2. CGY Alex Tanguay scored
  3. 3. DAL Brad Richards stopped
  4. 4. CGY Rene Bourque stopped
  5. 5. DAL Mike Ribeiro scored
  6. 6. CGY Curtis Glencross scored
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 15:05CGYMatt Stajan: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 16:38CGYRene Bourque: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:00DALStephane Robidas: High sticking2 min
  4. P3 17:32CGYCory Sarich: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
47% to win53% to win
← CGY attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ribeiro won the faceoff against Jokinen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYDAL
34Shots on goal34
4.0Expected goals3.0
57Shot attempts63
33Faceoffs won37
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
28Hits27
15Blocked shots11
5Giveaways11
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestIginla – Tanguay – Moss8:44

    xG 1.28–0.24 (84%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  2. Kostopoulos – Jackman – Backlund4:25

    xG 0.63–0.05 (93%)attempts 6–4goals 1–1

  3. Modin – Hagman – Stajan7:25

    xG 0.20–0.02 (90%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  4. Jokinen – Glencross – Bourque9:06

    xG 0.03–0.13 (21%)attempts 4–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStaios – Babchuk8:10

    xG 1.27–0.05 (96%)attempts 13–6goals 2–1

  2. Sarich – Giordano13:21

    xG 0.82–0.42 (66%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

  3. Regehr – Bouwmeester10:57

    xG 0.12–0.14 (47%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestRichards – Eriksson – Wandell5:47

    xG 0.24–0.06 (81%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  2. Langenbrunner – Petersen – Benn2:36

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Richards – Eriksson – Vincour2:44

    xG 0.05–0.09 (36%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Morrow – Ribeiro – Benn4:48

    xG 0.01–0.16 (7%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Robidas – Goligoski13:20

    xG 0.17–0.53 (25%)attempts 11–12goals 0–1

  2. Woywitka – Daley11:56

    xG 0.19–0.85 (18%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Skrastins – Fistric5:46

    xG 0.07–0.77 (9%)attempts 5–7goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 3.0 xGCGY 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #169 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.74 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 67% of the time.

DAL winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).