Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 20, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Montréal Canadiens 8, Minnesota Wild 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 53% of the time.

MIN winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL21141328832
MIN01208111131

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:31MTLRyan WhiteAssists: Benoit Pouliot, P.K. Subban · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:47MTLAndrei KostitsynGWGAssists: Benoit Pouliot · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P2 0:51MTLP.K. SubbanAssists: David Desharnais, Benoit Pouliot · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–0
  4. P2 5:22MTLJames WisniewskiAssists: Michael Cammalleri, Alex Auld · Snap, 0.13 xG4–0
  5. P2 7:35MTLTravis MoenAssists: Scott Gomez, Roman Hamrlik · Backhand, 0.29 xG5–0
  6. P2 16:23MTLP.K. SubbanPPAssists: James Wisniewski, Michael Cammalleri · Slap, 0.02 xG6–0
  7. P3 1:27MTLP.K. SubbanAssists: Ryan White, David Desharnais · Slap, 0.02 xG7–0
  8. P3 12:14MINMikko KoivuUnassisted · Backhand, 0.36 xG7–1
  9. P3 13:55MTLTom PyattAssists: Brian Gionta, David Desharnais · Snap, 0.06 xG8–1
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 6:31MTLRyan White: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 6:31MINClayton Stoner: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 7:06MTLAndrei Kostitsyn: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 17:05MINBrad Staubitz: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 3:01MTLAaron Palushaj: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 15:46MINBrad Staubitz: Roughing2 min · PPG
  7. P2 18:22MINAntti Miettinen: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 19:21MINMikko Koivu: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 7:51MINCal Clutterbuck: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P3 7:51MTLPaul Mara: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 7:51MTLPaul Mara: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 7:51MINCal Clutterbuck: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 10:52MTLBrian Gionta: Tripping2 min
  14. P3 16:20MINMartin Havlat: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← MTL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Madden won the faceoff against Desharnais
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLMIN
32Shots on goal31
2.2Expected goals2.3
48Shot attempts58
26Faceoffs won37
5Power plays3
23Penalty minutes27
4Hits19
15Blocked shots7
4Giveaways6
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestPouliot – Desharnais – White7:33

    xG 0.40–0.03 (93%)attempts 6–2goals 3–0

  2. Gomez – Gionta – Moen8:40

    xG 0.42–0.17 (72%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Cammalleri – Kostitsyn – Eller11:17

    xG 0.34–0.42 (45%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0

  4. Dawes – Pyatt – Palushaj6:20

    xG 0.14–0.25 (36%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamrlik – Wisniewski15:17

    xG 0.80–0.30 (73%)attempts 14–13goals 3–0

  2. Gill – Subban12:50

    xG 0.58–0.27 (69%)attempts 14–12goals 2–0

  3. Picard – Subban3:30

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBrunette – Miettinen – Koivu6:22

    xG 0.13–0.05 (73%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Kobasew – Nystrom – Staubitz4:31

    xG 0.09–0.07 (57%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Cullen – Madden – Clutterbuck5:54

    xG 0.21–0.42 (33%)attempts 6–6goals 0–3

  4. Havlat – Bouchard – Brodziak5:36

    xG 0.08–0.61 (12%)attempts 3–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestStoner – Spurgeon12:27

    xG 0.43–0.21 (67%)attempts 14–8goals 0–1

  2. Zanon – Prosser14:14

    xG 0.24–0.46 (34%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Burns12:55

    xG 0.30–0.55 (36%)attempts 11–10goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.3 xGMTL 2.2 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1029 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.56 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 53% of the time.

MIN winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).