Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 24, 2011·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Edmonton Oilers 0, St. Louis Blues 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 65% of the time.

STL winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM050502012
STL0917314430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 18:28STLT.J. OshieGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P3 2:12STLMatt D'AgostiniPPAssists: T.J. Hensick · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P3 8:30STLChris StewartPPAssists: T.J. Oshie, Andy McDonald · Wrist, 0.20 xG0–3
  4. P3 15:07STLAdam CracknellAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk · Snap, 0.05 xG0–4
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 3:08STLCam Janssen: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 3:08EDMJim Vandermeer: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 3:09STLRyan Reaves: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 3:09EDMTheo Peckham: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 8:37EDMLiam Reddox: Hooking2 min
  6. P1 17:43STLB.J. Crombeen: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 17:43EDMJean-Francois Jacques: Fighting5 min
  8. P1 17:43EDMJean-Francois Jacques: Interference2 min
  9. P2 7:22STLAdam Cracknell: Holding2 min
  10. P2 9:21EDMLinus Omark: Hooking2 min
  11. P2 10:45STLAndy McDonald: Holding2 min
  12. P3 0:48EDMLiam Reddox: Tripping2 min · PPG
  13. P3 4:27STLB.J. Crombeen: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 7:57EDMJim Vandermeer: High sticking2 min · PPG
  15. P3 15:44EDMSteve MacIntyre: Hooking2 min
  16. P3 16:03STLAlex Pietrangelo: Cross checking2 min
  17. P3 19:09STLCam Janssen: Roughing2 min
  18. P3 19:09EDMTheo Peckham: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win53% to win
← EDM attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDonald won the faceoff against Cogliano
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMSTL
12Shots on goal30
1.3Expected goals2.1
48Shot attempts48
26Faceoffs won29
4Power plays6
29Penalty minutes25
27Hits19
14Blocked shots24
6Giveaways4
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestJacques – Fraser – Hartikainen9:10

    xG 0.24–0.07 (77%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  2. MacIntyre – O'Marra – VandeVelde4:07

    xG 0.13–0.06 (69%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Jones – Cogliano – Eberle9:09

    xG 0.22–0.19 (53%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  4. Reddox – Omark – Paajarvi12:21

    xG 0.10–0.36 (22%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestStrudwick – Peckham10:56

    xG 0.39–0.03 (92%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. Strudwick – Petry3:41

    xG 0.11–0.07 (60%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Gilbert – Smid15:47

    xG 0.28–0.27 (51%)attempts 15–13goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestOshie – Stewart – McRae7:32

    xG 0.17–0.10 (63%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  2. Janssen – Reaves – McRae2:52

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. McDonald – Backes – D'Agostini8:32

    xG 0.28–0.29 (49%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Oshie – Hensick – Stewart3:34

    xG 0.05–0.08 (36%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestColaiacovo – Pietrangelo12:04

    xG 0.38–0.12 (76%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  2. Cole – Shattenkirk10:40

    xG 0.21–0.15 (58%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0

  3. Nikitin – Shattenkirk2:48

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.1 xGEDM 1.3 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 10/100 · #1074 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.75 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 65% of the time.

STL winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).