- Age
- 42
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 185 cm
- Weight
- 93 kg
- Born
- Toronto, CAN
- Draft
- 2003, round 9, #282 (CHI)
Career · 2010–11 to 2015–16
- Games
- 228
- Goals
- 14
- Points
- 32
- TOI per game
- 10:15
- xGF% (5v5)
- 48.0%
- Goals above expected
- −8.7
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2010–11 to 2015–16 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
4th line
19th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.3617th pct
- Assists /600.4614th pct
- ixG /600.5833rd pct
- Goals above expected−8.712th pct
Play-driving
3rd line- xGF% (5v5)48.0%38th pct
- CF% (5v5)48.7%44th pct
- Relative xGF%−4.022nd pct
- Penalty diff /600.3679th pct
Usage
Extra / AHL- TOI per game10:1516th pct
- PP time share1.2%10th pct
- Offensive zone starts50.5%34th pct
- Quality of competition23.3%24th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Porter wins the draw over 2010–11 to 2015–16, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1137+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
43.7%
52–67 · below the 1137 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
44.0%
Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.
Wins above average
−7
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
1.9
119 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone44.0% 22–28
- Neutral zone50.0% 20–20
- Defensive zone34.5% 10–19
By strength
- Even strength45.6% 52–62
- Power play0.0% 0–1
- Shorthanded0.0% 0–4
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +17 after a win, −21 after a loss. Each win was worth 3.0 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Kyle Brodziak80.0% 4–1
- Tom Wandell75.0% 3–1
- Nick Spaling75.0% 3–1
- Derek MacKenzie25.0% 1–3
- Andrew Shaw75.0% 3–1
- Mark Letestu25.0% 1–3
- Jerred Smithson0.0% 0–3
- Michal Handzus33.3% 1–2
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010–11 | 22 | 54.5% | 55.8% |
| 2011–12 | 19 | 42.1% | 41.9% |
| 2012–13 | 58 | 43.1% | 43.3% |
| 2013–14 | 10 | 30.0% | 29.9% |
| 2014–15 | 9 | 44.4% | 44.0% |
| 2015–16 | 1 | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−8.7 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games