Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 28, 2011·Honda Center, Anaheim

Colorado Avalanche 4, Anaheim Ducks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 68% of the time.

ANA winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL213110112435
ANA01731827542

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:34COLRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: Milan Hejduk, Ryan Stoa · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:17COLMatt DucheneAssists: Milan Hejduk, Matt Hunwick · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–0
  3. P2 0:47ANATeemu SelanneUnassisted · Wrist, 0.36 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:06ANAJason BlakeAssists: Teemu Selanne, Saku Koivu · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P2 9:01ANATeemu SelanneAssists: Cam Fowler, Saku Koivu · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P2 15:30COLDavid JonesAssists: Daniel Winnik, Ryan O'Byrne · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–3
  7. P3 2:49ANACam FowlerPPAssists: Teemu Selanne, Lubomir Visnovsky · Slap, 0.13 xG3–4
  8. P3 15:11ANATeemu SelannePPGWGAssists: Corey Perry, Ryan Getzlaf · Backhand, 0.20 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:18COLPaul StastnyAssists: Milan Hejduk, Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–5
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 2:03ANABrad Winchester: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 4:09COLDavid Koci: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 4:09ANAGeorge Parros: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 10:01COLMatt Duchene: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 16:00COLDavid Koci: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 16:00ANAJarkko Ruutu: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 16:00COLCody McLeod: Roughing2 min
  8. P1 16:00ANAGeorge Parros: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 0:47COLJohn-Michael Liles: Penalty shot covering puck in crease0 min
  10. P2 5:05COLPaul Stastny: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 1:35COLCameron Gaunce: Tripping2 min · PPG
  12. P3 11:51ANAToni Lydman: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 15:00COLMilan Hejduk: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← COL attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Stastny
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLANA
35Shots on goal42
2.6Expected goals3.7
58Shot attempts62
27Faceoffs won40
2Power plays4
17Penalty minutes13
25Hits31
10Blocked shots8
10Giveaways12
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestJones – Winnik – O'Reilly10:28

    xG 0.57–0.15 (79%)attempts 12–4goals 1–0

  2. McClement – McLeod – Olver2:26

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  3. McClement – Porter – Stoa4:49

    xG 0.00–0.29 (0%)attempts 0–8goals 0–0

  4. Hejduk – Stastny – Duchene14:31

    xG 0.54–1.04 (34%)attempts 12–22goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGaunce – Holos10:05

    xG 0.73–0.30 (71%)attempts 17–6goals 0–0

  2. O'Byrne – Hunwick16:16

    xG 0.46–0.70 (40%)attempts 13–18goals 1–0

  3. Liles – Johnson18:54

    xG 0.52–0.97 (35%)attempts 11–19goals 1–2

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSelanne – Koivu – Blake11:43

    xG 0.60–0.20 (76%)attempts 12–6goals 2–0

  2. Getzlaf – Perry – Ryan15:12

    xG 0.86–0.53 (62%)attempts 16–16goals 0–0

  3. Marchant – Ruutu – Parros3:15

    xG 0.27–0.03 (90%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  4. Winchester – Beleskey – McMillan8:39

    xG 0.19–0.74 (20%)attempts 4–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLydman – Visnovsky16:56

    xG 1.21–0.59 (67%)attempts 24–15goals 0–1

  2. Brookbank – Fowler12:59

    xG 0.51–0.23 (69%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Beauchemin – Fowler3:45

    xG 0.03–0.03 (53%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.7 xGCOL 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #102 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.02 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 68% of the time.

ANA winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).