Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Apr 4, 2011·HP Pavilion at San Jose, San Jose

Los Angeles Kings 1, San Jose Sharks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 51% of the time.

SJS winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK01211208132
SJS21041609635

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:47SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Torrey Mitchell, Kyle Wellwood · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:26SJSMarc-Edouard VlasicGWGAssists: Kyle Wellwood, Joe Pavelski · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 1:57LAKMichal HandzusAssists: Matt Greene, Alec Martinez · Backhand, 0.30 xG1–2
  4. P2 2:19SJSKyle WellwoodAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Andrew Desjardins · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P2 5:33SJSDan BoyleAssists: Joe Thornton, Douglas Murray · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P2 9:20SJSJoe ThorntonAssists: Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–5
  7. P2 19:33SJSDevin SetoguchiAssists: Patrick Marleau, Dan Boyle · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 11:37LAKKyle Clifford: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 11:37SJSJamal Mayers: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 19:46SJSJamal Mayers: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 17:12SJSDan Boyle: Fighting5 min
  5. P3 17:12LAKBrad Richardson: Fighting5 min
  6. P3 17:12SJSDouglas Murray: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 17:12LAKKyle Clifford: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 17:12SJSDan Boyle: Game misconduct10 min
  9. P3 17:12SJSDan Boyle: Instigator face shield2 min
  10. P3 17:12SJSDan Boyle: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← LAK attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Marleau won the faceoff against Handzus
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKSJS
32Shots on goal35
2.7Expected goals2.8
61Shot attempts49
25Faceoffs won22
3Power plays0
15Penalty minutes31
31Hits25
5Blocked shots20
8Giveaways11
10Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestHandzus – Brown – Penner15:06

    xG 0.81–0.45 (64%)attempts 15–7goals 0–1

  2. Brown – Richardson – Clifford2:05

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Ponikarovsky – Lewis – Westgarth8:52

    xG 0.37–0.42 (46%)attempts 10–4goals 0–1

  4. Smyth – Stoll – Moller11:15

    xG 0.45–0.61 (42%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestScuderi – Doughty17:31

    xG 0.80–0.39 (67%)attempts 17–10goals 0–1

  2. Johnson – Martinez3:36

    xG 0.04–0.04 (46%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Mitchell – Johnson15:06

    xG 0.56–0.61 (48%)attempts 16–13goals 0–2

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestWellwood – Pavelski – Mitchell12:43

    xG 1.16–0.42 (74%)attempts 20–8goals 2–0

  2. Mayers – Eager – Desjardins9:08

    xG 0.38–0.29 (57%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Mayers – Heatley – Couture3:07

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – Marleau – Setoguchi13:36

    xG 0.65–0.74 (47%)attempts 8–13goals 3–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Demers17:32

    xG 1.14–0.40 (74%)attempts 23–12goals 3–0

  2. Boyle – Murray16:43

    xG 0.44–0.56 (44%)attempts 11–15goals 1–0

  3. Wallin – White16:44

    xG 0.59–1.36 (30%)attempts 8–21goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.8 xGLAK 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 25/100 · #868 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.79 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 51% of the time.

SJS winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).