Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 3, 2011·HP Pavilion at San Jose, San Jose

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, San Jose Sharks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 75% of the time.

SJS winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT21516011040336
SJS04117214021437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:24PITDeryk EngellandAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Steve Sullivan · Wrist, 0.00 xG1–0
  2. P1 2:04PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Steve Sullivan, James Neal · Deflected, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:37SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Martin Havlat, Jim Vandermeer · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:37PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: James Neal, Kris Letang · Deflected, 0.14 xG3–1
  5. P3 9:11SJSRyane CloweAssists: Martin Havlat, Dan Boyle · Backhand, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 15:06SJSJamie McGinnAssists: Michal Handzus, Dan Boyle · Slap, 0.14 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. SJS Logan Couture stopped
  2. 2. PIT Kris Letang stopped
  3. 3. SJS Dan Boyle stopped
  4. 4. PIT Evgeni Malkin stopped
  5. 5. SJS Ryane Clowe scored
  6. 6. PIT Pascal Dupuis stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 18:31SJSBrad Winchester: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 18:31PITCraig Adams: Fighting5 min
  3. P2 0:06PITDeryk Engelland: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 0:06SJSRyane Clowe: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 13:52PITBrooks Orpik: Interference2 min
  6. P2 16:06PITMatt Niskanen: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 16:06SJSMartin Havlat: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thornton won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITSJS
36Shots on goal37
2.0Expected goals3.5
58Shot attempts73
25Faceoffs won39
0Power plays1
14Penalty minutes12
33Hits21
17Blocked shots16
11Giveaways15
12Takeaways22

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestSullivan – Malkin – Neal15:22

    xG 1.01–0.52 (66%)attempts 21–17goals 3–1

  2. Park – Dupuis – Kunitz11:16

    xG 0.31–0.29 (52%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  3. Adams – Vitale – Jeffrey5:38

    xG 0.12–0.18 (39%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Asham – Cooke – Letestu9:06

    xG 0.04–0.37 (9%)attempts 4–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Engelland5:57

    xG 0.68–0.23 (74%)attempts 14–5goals 2–0

  2. Engelland – Letang3:37

    xG 0.34–0.12 (74%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  3. Martin – Letang10:29

    xG 0.21–0.14 (60%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHandzus – Havlat – McGinn4:45

    xG 0.39–0.14 (74%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Marleau – Havlat – McGinn2:12

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0

  3. Marleau – Clowe – Mitchell6:02

    xG 0.50–0.37 (58%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

  4. Havlat – Clowe – Couture2:59

    xG 0.12–0.02 (85%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVandermeer – Braun12:46

    xG 0.58–0.12 (83%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Boyle – Murray17:47

    xG 0.73–0.44 (62%)attempts 18–14goals 1–0

  3. Murray – Burns2:00

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.5 xGPIT 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #201 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.02 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 75% of the time.

SJS winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).