Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 10, 2011·MTS Centre, Winnipeg

Florida Panthers 5, Winnipeg Jets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

WPG winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA2521015520
WPG0406217227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:14FLAKris VersteegAssists: Tomas Fleischmann, Stephen Weiss · Deflected, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:27FLAKris VersteegPPAssists: Tomas Fleischmann, Brian Campbell · Backhand, 0.24 xG2–0
  3. P2 4:53FLAJason GarrisonGWGAssists: Kris Versteeg, Brian Campbell · Snap, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P2 18:04FLAMike SantorelliPPAssists: Brian Campbell, Dmitry Kulikov · Wrist, 0.16 xG4–0
  5. P3 2:28WPGTim StapletonPPAssists: Evander Kane, Nik Antropov · Slap, 0.52 xG4–1
  6. P3 5:40WPGAndrew LaddAssists: Zach Bogosian, Mark Stuart · Deflected, 0.01 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:41FLAKris VersteegENAssists: Dmitry Kulikov · Backhand, 0.69 xG5–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:42FLAKeaton Ellerby: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 16:14WPGNik Antropov: Illegal check to head2 min · PPG
  3. P2 5:25WPGMark Stuart: Interference2 min
  4. P2 16:43WPGDustin Byfuglien: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 1:46FLATomas Fleischmann: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 11:47WPGDustin Byfuglien: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 14:07FLAMike Weaver: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 19:54WPGAlexander Burmistrov: Elbowing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WPG
45% to win55% to win
← FLA attackWPG attack →
  1. P1 20:00Little won the faceoff against Goc
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAWPG
20Shots on goal27
2.9Expected goals2.7
47Shot attempts52
29Faceoffs won32
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
9Hits25
11Blocked shots9
5Giveaways15
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestSturm – Kopecky – Santorelli2:13

    xG 0.11–0.04 (72%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Weiss – Fleischmann – Versteeg11:18

    xG 0.40–0.39 (51%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  3. Kopecky – Upshall – Santorelli3:36

    xG 0.02–0.06 (27%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Sturm – Goc – Skille9:51

    xG 0.14–0.18 (44%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJovanovski – Garrison2:37

    xG 0.13–0.03 (81%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Weaver – Kulikov15:21

    xG 0.16–0.11 (60%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  3. Campbell – Garrison13:10

    xG 0.30–0.28 (52%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestWellwood – Slater – Glass6:06

    xG 0.45–0.01 (97%)attempts 10–1goals 0–0

  2. Antropov – Kane – Burmistrov11:53

    xG 0.32–0.22 (59%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  3. Ladd – Wheeler – Little8:12

    xG 0.23–0.14 (62%)attempts 8–3goals 0–1

  4. Ladd – Wheeler – Stapleton3:25

    xG 0.06–0.02 (75%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Byfuglien17:11

    xG 0.97–0.27 (78%)attempts 18–10goals 0–0

  2. Flood – Festerling10:07

    xG 0.33–0.20 (62%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Stuart – Bogosian12:30

    xG 0.21–0.21 (50%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WPG 2.7 xGFLA 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WPGFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #426 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.78 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50WPG 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

WPG winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (WPG − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).