Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 23, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Nashville Predators 2, Minnesota Wild 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 60% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH190818225
MIN01001238330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:21NSHJordin TootooAssists: Craig Smith, Nick Spaling · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P3 1:05MINDany HeatleyAssists: Mikko Koivu, Devin Setoguchi · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P3 9:39MINKyle BrodziakPPAssists: Matt Cullen, Marco Scandella · Snap, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P3 13:19MINCal ClutterbuckSHGWGAssists: Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P3 13:57NSHRyan SuterPPAssists: Jordin Tootoo, Martin Erat · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 1:55NSHMartin Erat: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 2:22MINCal Clutterbuck: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 2:12MINColton Gillies: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 4:38NSHFrancis Bouillon: Interference2 min
  5. P2 6:56MINMatt Cullen: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 8:04NSHColin Wilson: High sticking double minor4 min
  7. P3 1:43MINPierre-Marc Bouchard: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 6:29NSHCraig Smith: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  9. P3 8:12NSHRyan Suter: Slashing2 min · PPG
  10. P3 12:20MINNick Johnson: Boarding2 min · PPG
  11. P3 13:36MINNate Prosser: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 13:36MINCal Clutterbuck: Elbowing2 min
  13. P3 13:36NSHPatric Hornqvist: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← NSH attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fisher won the faceoff against Brodziak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHMIN
25Shots on goal30
2.2Expected goals1.8
48Shot attempts60
27Faceoffs won29
6Power plays6
14Penalty minutes14
15Hits17
16Blocked shots11
7Giveaways5
2Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestTootoo – Spaling – Smith6:41

    xG 0.34–0.12 (74%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  2. Fisher – Erat – Kostitsyn10:02

    xG 0.12–0.26 (32%)attempts 6–16goals 0–0

  3. Legwand – Hornqvist – Wilson6:34

    xG 0.04–0.24 (13%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouillon – Klein10:23

    xG 0.13–0.04 (78%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. Blum – Hillen8:11

    xG 0.09–0.20 (32%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

  3. Suter – Weber13:26

    xG 0.13–0.46 (21%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHeatley – Koivu – Setoguchi9:47

    xG 0.45–0.21 (68%)attempts 13–8goals 1–1

  2. Brodziak – Johnson – Powe9:25

    xG 0.20–0.03 (86%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  3. Peters – Staubitz – Gillies3:29

    xG 0.02–0.02 (52%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Bouchard – Clutterbuck9:10

    xG 0.07–0.20 (26%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Spurgeon11:14

    xG 0.20–0.06 (77%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Falk – Prosser11:28

    xG 0.28–0.21 (57%)attempts 16–9goals 0–1

  3. Schultz – Stoner14:10

    xG 0.22–0.23 (50%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.8 xGNSH 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #535 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.67 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 60% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).