Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 25, 2011·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Ottawa Senators 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 92% of the time.

PIT winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT1911117327
PIT412115113640

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:19OTTKaspars DaugavinsAssists: Erik Karlsson, Erik Condra · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 1:46PITChris KunitzAssists: Sidney Crosby, Deryk Engelland · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 3:25PITTyler KennedyAssists: Paul Martin, Marc-Andre Fleury · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P1 7:21PITSteve SullivanPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–3
  5. P1 9:11PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–4
  6. P2 3:45PITPascal DupuisAssists: Arron Asham, Tyler Kennedy · Snap, 0.16 xG1–5
  7. P2 15:46OTTJared CowenAssists: Daniel Alfredsson, Nick Foligno · Slap, 0.04 xG2–5
  8. P3 8:41PITJordan StaalAssists: Tyler Kennedy, Paul Martin · Snap, 0.07 xG2–6
  9. P3 16:29OTTErik CondraAssists: Nick Foligno, Brian Lee · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–6
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 1:48OTTZenon Konopka: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 1:48PITArron Asham: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 5:34OTTBobby Butler: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  4. P1 7:04OTTZack Smith: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 13:25OTTFilip Kuba: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P1 19:46PITPaul Martin: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 11:22OTTJesse Winchester: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 17:19PITArron Asham: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 2:44PITSidney Crosby: Elbowing2 min
  10. P3 2:44OTTNick Foligno: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 6:46PITJoe Vitale: Interference2 min
  12. P3 8:13OTTSergei Gonchar: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 13:59PITJames Neal: Interference goalkeeper2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← OTT attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Spezza won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTPIT
27Shots on goal40
1.2Expected goals4.1
54Shot attempts80
27Faceoffs won43
4Power plays5
17Penalty minutes15
23Hits19
18Blocked shots18
6Giveaways6
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestAlfredsson – Spezza – Michalek2:38

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Daugavins – Condra – Smith7:27

    xG 0.35–0.26 (57%)attempts 10–6goals 2–0

  3. Alfredsson – Foligno – Winchester4:06

    xG 0.07–0.27 (22%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Spezza – Michalek – Greening7:20

    xG 0.04–0.50 (8%)attempts 4–17goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Phillips – Karlsson2:24

    xG 0.11–0.21 (35%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. Kuba – Karlsson12:06

    xG 0.38–0.58 (40%)attempts 15–15goals 1–1

  3. Lee – Cowen7:59

    xG 0.10–0.48 (17%)attempts 4–6goals 1–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Crosby – Neal3:04

    xG 0.31–0.04 (88%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Cooke – Kennedy – Staal2:54

    xG 0.24–0.04 (86%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  3. Dupuis – Kunitz – Crosby2:11

    xG 0.13–0.02 (83%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  4. Cooke – Dupuis – Kennedy2:22

    xG 0.03–0.03 (50%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Michalek9:20

    xG 0.54–0.04 (93%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  2. Martin – Niskanen3:32

    xG 0.39–0.04 (91%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Engelland – Niskanen9:25

    xG 0.55–0.20 (74%)attempts 14–6goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.1 xGOTT 1.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #565 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 92% of the time.

PIT winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).