Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 2, 2011·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Edmonton Oilers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 55% of the time.

EDM winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ12111018339
EDM17012515634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:21EDMJordan EberlePPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Tom Gilbert · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:54CBJMark LetestuPPAssists: Rick Nash, James Wisniewski · Slap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:16CBJDerek DorsettSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–1
  4. P3 1:41EDMRyan JonesAssists: Ryan Smyth, Ryan Whitney · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:19EDMLadislav SmidAssists: Tom Gilbert, Ryan Smyth · Slap, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P3 8:06EDMRyan JonesGWGAssists: Eric Belanger, Magnus Paajarvi · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–4
  7. P3 11:00CBJDerek DorsettAssists: Marc Methot, Derek MacKenzie · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–4
  8. P3 15:57EDMAles HemskyAssists: Shawn Horcoff, Sam Gagner · Backhand, 0.20 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:22EDMRyan JonesENAssists: Shawn Horcoff, Ales Hemsky · Wrist, 0.71 xG3–6
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 0:13CBJRick Nash: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:30EDMAndy Sutton: Holding2 min
  3. P1 17:00CBJJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 17:00EDMDarcy Hordichuk: Fighting5 min · PPG
  5. P1 17:00EDMDarcy Hordichuk: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P1 18:28EDMSam Gagner: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P2 9:25CBJJared Boll: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 15:41EDMLadislav Smid: Holding2 min
  9. P3 8:22EDMSam Gagner: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
45% to win55% to win
← CBJ attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horcoff won the faceoff against Vermette
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJEDM
39Shots on goal34
3.7Expected goals3.3
68Shot attempts48
31Faceoffs won35
5Power plays2
9Penalty minutes15
11Hits16
6Blocked shots22
14Giveaways20
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestProspal – Letestu – Johansen7:01

    xG 0.55–0.31 (64%)attempts 12–11goals 0–2

  2. Umberger – Dorsett – Brassard8:55

    xG 0.32–0.17 (66%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Huselius – Vermette – Nash11:14

    xG 0.62–0.58 (51%)attempts 12–8goals 0–1

  4. Pahlsson – MacKenzie – Boll4:45

    xG 0.04–0.04 (50%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTyutin – Nikitin15:42

    xG 1.01–0.60 (63%)attempts 20–12goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Clitsome10:11

    xG 0.83–0.72 (54%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  3. Wisniewski – Methot14:11

    xG 0.35–0.45 (44%)attempts 12–15goals 0–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestSmyth – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins12:29

    xG 0.69–0.39 (64%)attempts 17–12goals 1–0

  2. Hordichuk – Petrell – O'Marra4:00

    xG 0.04–0.04 (48%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Horcoff – Hemsky – Gagner13:05

    xG 0.72–0.86 (45%)attempts 12–12goals 1–1

  4. Belanger – Jones – Paajarvi8:00

    xG 0.14–0.59 (20%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSutton – Peckham13:45

    xG 0.76–0.17 (82%)attempts 9–10goals 2–0

  2. Gilbert – Smid11:42

    xG 0.63–0.56 (53%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  3. Whitney – Petry14:31

    xG 0.61–0.75 (45%)attempts 18–18goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.3 xGCBJ 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #181 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.87 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 55% of the time.

EDM winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).